Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:36:44.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress and Mechanical Constants Characterizations of Phase-change SbTe-alloys: Influence of the Film Thickness and Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Judit Lisoni
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, PT/MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
T. Gille
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, PT/MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium
L. Goux
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, PT/MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium
R. Delhougne
Affiliation:
[email protected], NXP Semiconductors, Research, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium
N. Jossart
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, PT/MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium
K. Attenborough
Affiliation:
[email protected], NXP Semiconductors, Research, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium
D. J. Wouters
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, PT/MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

We have characterized the in-film stress and the mechanical constants of a growth-dominated phase-change SbTe-alloy, a material beneficially used in the line-cell phase change memory architecture. The influence of the thickness of the films (5-120 nm) and of the substrate used for its deposition (Si, SiO2 and SiC) was studied. The characterizations were carried out on both amorphous and crystalline films. The crystallization temperature was determined by the resistance changes as a function of the temperature. The mechanical characteristics of the films were measured by the wafer curvature method. We observed that the mechanical behavior of these films was strongly dependent on their thicknesses and on the substrate material. For the thinnest amorphous films, the in-film stress was highly compressive (with the largest compressive stress for films on SiC), while it tended to be very low (fully relaxed films) for films thicker than 20 nm. The amorphous films furthermore did not reveal any stress relaxation in time-dependent stress measurements. Therefore, it was not possible to quantify the viscosity of the SbTe-alloy. This result maybe related to a lower defect state in the very thin films used, or to a blocking of the defects by enhanced reactivity of these thin SbTe-alloy films with their surroundings, both resulting in the absence of relaxation in the amorphous state. Finally, the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) of the amorphous and crystalline SbTe-alloys were similar, 1–3×10−6 K−1. These values were comparable to the CTE's of the substrates, clearly indicating that for thin films the substrates dominate their thermal expansion behavior.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pedersen, T.P. Leervad, Kalb, J., Njoroge, W. K., Wamwangi, D., Wuttig, M. and Spaepen, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3597 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Kalb, J., Spaepen, F., Pedersen, T.P. Leervad and Wuttig, M., J. Appl. Phys. 94, 4908 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Lankhorst, M.H.R., Ketelaars, B.W.S.M.M. and Wolters, R.A.M., Nature Materials 4, 347 (2005).Google Scholar
4. Stoney, G. G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 82, 172 (1909); σtotal=Es(1/Rf-1/Ri)ts 2/(6(1- εs)tf); Es, ε s Young's Modulus (130 GPa) and Poisson ratio (0.28) of the silicon substrate, ts, tf: thickness of the substrate (725 µm) and film; Ri and Rf curvature radii before and after a particular process, respectively.Google Scholar
5.Δσthermal/ΔT= Ef/(1-εf)(αsf); Δσthermal/ΔT slope of the thermal stress cycle, Ef, εf Young's Modulus and Poisson ratio of the SbTe-alloy, αs, αf thermal expansion coefficients of the substrate (2.6x10-6 K-1) and the film, respectively. We have experimentally determined Ef by nanoindentation. The values measured are 47ţ4 GPa and 65ţ5 for amorphous and crystallized SbTe-alloys, respectively. εf = 0.3 as a good approximation.Google Scholar