Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:18:12.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Standing the Test of Time: Signals and Noise From Environmental Assessments of Energy Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Björn A. Sandén*
Affiliation:
[email protected], Chalmers University of Technology, Energy and Environment, Environmental Systems Analysis, Sven Hultins gata 6, Göteborg, SE-412 96, Sweden, +46 31 772 8612
Get access

Abstract

The point of view taken here is that systems analysis is a kind of learning process, not data gathering, not decision making, but the production and effective communication of arguments relevant in a particular context. This idea, that the intended application of the result of an assessment has consequences for methodological choices, is beginning to spread in the LCA research community. One problem is that standard LCA methodology is developed to answer questions about environmental impacts of the current production and use of one unit of a product or minor product or process changes. When this methodology, unchanged, is used to provide answers to questions about strategic technology choice, i.e. not decisions that aim at improving a process within an existing technological environment, but with the long-term goal of changing large-scale technological systems, the result could be of little value or misleading. In many cases, LCAs produce more noise than knowledge. This observation seems to be of particular importance for LCAs of energy technologies and for how energy use is treated in all kinds of LCAs. Here, it is suggested that a better understanding of some critical methodological issues related to time, universality, cause-effect relationships, technical maturity and system innovation, could result in better studies that reveal fundamental environmental issues related to the objects of study and reduce the noise from irrelevant information. Examples are given from the technology fields of solar cells, fuel cells, batteries, renewable transport fuels and carbon nanoparticles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tillman, A.-M., Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20, 113 (2000).10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00035-9Google Scholar
2. Curran, M.A., Mann, M., and Norris, G., Journal of Cleaner Production 13, 853 (2005)10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03.001Google Scholar
3. Jonasson, K.M. and Sandén, B. A., CPM Report No. 2004–6, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 2004.Google Scholar
4. Sandén, B. A., Jonasson, K.M., Karlström, M. and Tillman., A.-M., presented at the LCM2005 (Innovation by Life Cycle Management, Barcelona, 2005, Vol 1) pp. 3741.Google Scholar
5. Sandén, B. A. and Karlström, M., Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 1469 (2007).Google Scholar
6. Ekvall, T. and Tillman, A.-M., International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2, 155 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Ekvall, T. and Weidema, B.P., The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9, 161 (2004).10.1007/BF02994190Google Scholar
8. Sandén, B. A., presented at Workshop on life cycle analysis and recycling of solar modules -the waste challenge, Brussels (European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, 2004) pp. 3145.Google Scholar
9. Isaacs, J.A., Tanwani, A., and Healy, M.L., IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006, pp. 3841.Google Scholar
10. Kushnir, D. and Sandén, B. A., Journal of Industrial Ecology (submitted for publication) (2007).Google Scholar
11. Hillman, K.M. and Sandén, B. A., International Journal of Alternative Propulsion (accepted for publication) (2007).Google Scholar