Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:06:24.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special Hysteresis Effects in N2-Sorption and Mercury-Porosimetry Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Herbert Giesche
Herbert Giesche*
Affiliation:
New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, 2 Pine St., Alfred, NY 14802
Get access

Abstract

Model pore structures were prepared from dispersions of submicron monodispersed silica particles by a sedimentation process. Ordered dense sphere packing structures were observedwith scanning electron microscopy. Nitrogen sorption- as well as Hg-porosimetry measurements confirmed the calculated values of the pore openings in those structures. In Hgporosimetry measurements a two step extrusion curve was observed, when the pore system was only partially filled during the intrusion process. This two step curve was not observed in case the pore system was filled with mercury to more than 95% during the intrusion run. The mercury porosimetry results can be interpreted in terms of the coexistence of octahedral and tetrahedral voids (pores) in the examined sphere packing structure and their special arrangement within the structure (connectivity). Two models will be described to explain thegeneral occurrence of hysteresis in Hg-porosimetry. The actual pore geometry is shown to have a profound influence on the hysteresis shape as well as a change in the contact angle (constant within each measurement) can result in totally different hysteresis curves. Nitrogen adsorption and desorption measurements on the same powders did not reveal any fine structure within the hysteresis range.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 431: Symposium P – Microporous and Macroporous Materials , 1996 , 251
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gregg, S. J. and Sing, K. S. W.; ”Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity”; Academic Press, London (1982)Google Scholar
2 Everett, D. H., in Unger, K. K., Rouquerol, J., Sing, K.S.W. and Kral, H. (Eds.), Characterization of porous solids, studies in surface science and catalysis, Vol. 39, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pP. 1–21 Google Scholar
3 Karnaukhov, A.P. and Kiselev, A.V., Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 34, (1960) 1019 Google Scholar
4 Bukowiecki, S., Straube, B. and Unger, K. K.; ”Pore structure analysis of clos-packed silica spheres by means of nitrogen sorption and mercury porosimetry”; pp. 43–55 in ‘Principles and Applications of Pore Structural Characterization‘, ed. Haynes, J. M.; Rossi-Doria, P.; Arrowsmith, Bristol (1985)Google Scholar
5 Conner, W. C., Lane, Alan M., Ng, K. M. and Goldblatt, M.; ”Measurement of the morphology of high surface area solids: porosimetry of agglomerated particles”; J. Catal.; 83, 336–45 (1983)Google Scholar
6 Conner, W. Curtis and Lane, Alan M.; ”Measurement of the morphology of high surface area solids: effect of network structure on the simulation of porosity”; J. Catal.; 89, 217–25 (1984)Google Scholar
7 Conner, W. C., Lane, A. M. and Hoffman, A. J.; ”Measurement of the morphology of high surface area solids: hysteresis in mercury porosimetry”; J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 100[1], 185–93 (1984)Google Scholar
8 Conner, W. C., Cevallos-Candau, J. F., Weist, E. L., Pajares, J., Mendioroz, S. and Cortes, A.; ”Characterization of pore structure: porosimetry and sorption”; Langmuir; 2, 151–4 (1986)Google Scholar
9 Giesche, H., Unger, K. K., Müller, U. and Esser, U.; ”Hysteresis in nitrogen sorption and mercury porosimetry on mesoporous model adsorbents made of aggregated monodisperse silica spheres”; Colloids Surfaces; 37, 93–113 (1989)Google Scholar
10 Giesche, Herbert; ”Modellporenkörper aus monodispersen sphärischen SiO2- Partikeln:H erstellung, Charakterisierungu nd Sinterverhalten”; Dissertation, Universität Mainz (1987)Google Scholar
11 Stöber, Werner, Fink, Arthur and Bohn, Ernst; ”Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range”; J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 26[1], 62–69 (1968)Google Scholar
12 Giesche, Herbert; ”Synthesis of monodispersed silica powders. L particle properties and reaction kinetics”; J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.; 14 [3], 189–204 (1994)Google Scholar
13 Giesche, Herbert; ”Synthesis of monodispersed silica powders. II. controlled growth reaction and continuous production process”; J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.; 14 [3], 205–15 (1994)Google Scholar
14 Giesche, Herbert; ”Interpretation of hysteresis fine-structure’ in mercury porosimetry measurements”; pp. 505–10 in ‘Advances in Porous Materials’ Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 371, eds. Komarneni, S., Smith, D. M., and Beck, J. S., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh (1995)Google Scholar
15 McBain, James W.; ”An explanation of hysteresis in the hydration and dehydration of gels”; J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 57, 699–700 (1935)Google Scholar
16 Good, R.J. and Mikhail, R.S.; Powder Technology, 29, 53 (1981)Google Scholar
17 Kloubek, J.; Powder Technology, 29, 63 (1981)Google Scholar
18 Smith, Douglas M. and Stermer, Dorothy L.; ”Mercury porosimetry: theoretical and experimental characterization of random microsphere packings”; J. Colloid Interface Sci.; 111[1], 160–8 (1986)Google Scholar
19 Iczkowski, Raymond P.; ”Mercury penetration into aggregates of spheres”; Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.[4], 516–9 (1966)Google Scholar
20 Iczkowski, Raymond P.; ”Breakthrough pressure for random sphere packings”; Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.; 6[2], 263–5 (1967)Google Scholar
21 Mayer, Raymond P. and Stowe, Robert A.; ”Mercury porosimetry – breakthrough pressure for penetration between packed spheres”; J. Colloid Sci.; 20, 893–911 (1965)Google Scholar
22 Mayer, Raymond P. and Stowe, Robert A.; ”Mercury porosimetry: filling of toroidal void volume following breakthrough between spheres”; J. Phys. Chem.; 70[12], 3867–73 (1966)Google Scholar