Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:42:57.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sintered (Sr,U)-Containing Zirconolite Ceramics Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S.V. Stefanovsky
Affiliation:
SIA «RADON», 7th Rostovskii per., 2/14, Moscow 119121Russia
S.V. Ioudintsev
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Staromonetnii 35, Moscow 109017Russia
A.V. Ochkin
Affiliation:
D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
A.G. Ptashkin
Affiliation:
D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
S.V. Chizhevskaya
Affiliation:
D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
Get access

Abstract

Zirconolite-rich ceramics, containing strontium (∼1 wt.%) or uranium (5-20 wt.%) were prepared by cold pressing of mechanically activated oxide powders and sintering in air at 1200 TC for 2 hours. They were examined with XRD, optical and electron microscopy (SEM/TEM/EDS) methods. Zirconolite content in the samples was found to be as much as 85-90 vol.%, Baddeleyite, rutile, and perovskite (in the Sr-containing sample only) were present as minor phases. In the U-containing samples, two zirconolite varieties with different Zr/U ratio were found: zirconolite-1 and zirconolite-2 with average compositions Ca0.90Zr0.95U0.10Ti2.00O7.00, and Ca1.15Zr0.40U0.50Ti2.02O7.00 respectively. The amount of zirconolite-2 increases from ∼1 vol.% in the sample with the lowest uranium content to >50 vol.% in the sample containing ∼20 % U02. In the latter sample about 5 vol.% of cubic pyrochlore-type phase was also present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Vance, E.R. and Agrawal, D.K., Nuci. Chem. Waste Manag. 3, 229 (1982).Google Scholar
2 Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Day, R.A., Smith, K.L., Blackford, M.G., Begg, B.D., and Angel, P.J., J. Alloys and Comp., 213/214, 406 (1994).Google Scholar
3 Vance, E.R., Begg, B.D., Day, R.A., and Ball, C.J.., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 353, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 767.Google Scholar
4 Vance, E.R., Jostsons, A., Day, R.A., Ball, C.J., Begg, B.D., and Angel, P.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, edited by Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D.A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 412, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 41.Google Scholar
5 Knyazev, O.A., Stefanovsky, S.V., Ioudintsev, S.V., Nikonov, B.S., Omelianenko, B.I., Mokhov, A.V., and Yakushev, A.I., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J. and Triay, I.R. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), p. 401.Google Scholar
6 Bayliss, P., Mazzi, F., Munno, R., and White, T., Mineral. Mag. 53, 565 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Smith, K. L. and Lumpkin, G.R., in Defects and Processes in the Solid State: Geoscience Application, edited by Boland, J.N. and Gerald, J.D. Fitz, Elsev. Sci. Publ., 1993, p.401.Google Scholar
8 Coelho, A.A., Cheary, R.W., and Smith, K.L., J. Sol. State Chem., 129, 345 (1997).Google Scholar
9 Fielding, P.E. and White, T.J., J. Mater. Res., 2, 387 (1987).Google Scholar