Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:42:54.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A SAXS Study of Hydrogenated Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Kristin Kiriluk
Affiliation:
Don Williamson
Affiliation:
[email protected], Colorado School of Mines, Physics, Golden, Colorado, United States
David Bobela
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, United States
Craig Taylor
Affiliation:
[email protected], Colorado School of Mines, Physics, Golden, Colorado, United States
Baojie Yan
Affiliation:
[email protected], United Solar Ovonic LLC, R&D, Troy, Michigan, United States
Jeff Yang
Affiliation:
[email protected], United Solar Ovonic LLC, 1100 West Maple Road, Troy, Michigan, 48084, United States
Subhendu Guha
Affiliation:
[email protected], United Solar Ovonic LLC, Troy, Michigan, United States
Arun Madan
Affiliation:
[email protected], MVSystems, Inc, 500 Corporate Circle, Unit L, Golden, Colorado, 80401, United States, 3032719907, 3032719771
Feng Zhu
Affiliation:
[email protected], MVSystems, Inc, 500 Corporate Circle, Unit L, Golden, Colorado, 80401, United States, 3032719907, 3032719771
Get access

Abstract

We have used small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) in conjunction with X-ray diffraction (XRD) to study the nanostructure of hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H). The crystallite size in the growth direction, as deduced from XRD data, is 24 nm with a preferred [220] orientation in the growth direction of the film. Fitting the SAXS intensity shows that the scattering derives from electron density fluctuations of both voids in the amorphous phase and H-rich clusters in the film, probably at the crystallite interfaces. The SAXS results indicate ellipsoidal shaped crystallites about 6 nm in size perpendicular to the growth direction. We annealed the samples, stepwise, and then measured the SAXS and ESR. At temperatures below 350◦C, we observe an overall increase in the size of the scattering centers on annealing but only a small change in the spin density, which suggests that bond reconstruction on the crystallite surfaces takes place with high efficacy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Meier, J., Flückiger, R., Keppner, H., and Shah, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 860 (1994)Google Scholar
2 Yan, B., Yue, G., Yang, J., Guha, S., Williamson, D. L., Han, D., and Jiang, C.-S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1955 (2004)Google Scholar
3 Warren, B. E., X-ray Diffraction (Dover, New York, 1990)Google Scholar
4 Feigen, L. A. and Svergun, D. I., Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering (Plenum Press, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
5 Carlos, W. E. and Taylor, P. C., Phys. Rev. B 26, 3605 (1982)Google Scholar
6 Williamson, D. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 557, 251 (1999)Google Scholar
7 Kratky, O., Small Angle X-ray Scattering, edited by Glatter, O. and Kratky, O. (Academic Press, 1982).Google Scholar
8 Williamson, D. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 377, 251 (1995)Google Scholar
9 Beyer, W. and Wagner, H., J. of Appl. Phys. 53(12) (1982)Google Scholar
10 Zafar, S. and Schiff, E. A., Phys. Rev. B. 40 5235 (1989)Google Scholar