Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:38:58.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SAXS and in-situ SAXS to follow the structural evolution in hybrid materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2015

Silvia Pabisch
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Boltzmanngasse 5, Vienna, Austria
Harald Rennhofer
Affiliation:
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Physics and Material Science, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, Vienna, Austria
Nicola Hüsing
Affiliation:
Paris-Lodron University Salzburg, Materials Chemistry, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, Salzburg, Austria
Herwig Peterlik
Affiliation:
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Physics and Material Science, Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, Vienna, Austria
Get access

Abstract

The paper focuses on the evolution of oriented nanostructures: An orientation in real space leads to scattering intensities with a preferred orientation with respect to the azimuthal angle in reciprocal space. Thus, the macroscopic orientation of nanostructures can be obtained from SAXS patterns. The additional advantage of in-situ SAXS is that one can directly follow the development of orientated nanostructures during thermal treatment, under extreme conditions or during processing. This is shown in the following for an orientational change of pores in two very different systems, the first being the formation of pores within carbon fibers during loading at high temperatures up to 2000 °C and the second is the development of macroscopically aligned pores in mesostructured silica in the sol-gel process during shear.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Peterlik, H., Roschger, P., Klaushofer, K. and Fratzl, P., Nat. Mater. 5, 52 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, S.Y. and Lauke, B., Compos Sci Technol 56, 1179 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edie, D.D., Carbon 36, 345 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzer, E., High Temp.–High Press. 18, 479 (1986).Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Lu, Y.G., Xiao, H. and Peterlik, H., J. Mater. Sci. 49, 673 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L. et al. , Macromolecules 37, 4845 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlin, A., Carbon 22, 521 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, L. and Ruland, W., Coll. Polym. Sci. 258, 917 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shioya, M., Hayakawa, E., and Takaku, A., J. Mater. Sci. 31, 4521 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W.N. and Sharp, J.V., Carbon 12, 103 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, S.H., Firouzi, A., Stucky, G.D. and Chmelka, B.F., Science 278, 5336 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamauchi, Y. et al. , J. Mater. Chem. 15, 1137 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariga, K. et al. , Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 85, 132 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiang, Z. et al. , Carbon 82, 51 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennhofer, H., Loidl, D., Puchegger, S. and Peterlik, H., Carbon 48, 964 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennhofer, H. et al. , Carbon 80, 373 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perret, R. and Ruland, W., J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 209 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thünemann, A.F. and Ruland, W.. Macromolecules 33, 1848 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, O. et al. , J. Appl. Cryst. 40, S466 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruland, W. and Smarsly, B., J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 78(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandhuber, D. et al. , Chem. Mater. 17, 4262 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, M. et al. , Silicon 1, 19 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bras, W. and Ryan, A.J., Adv. Colloid Interfac. 75, 1 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar