Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T07:59:57.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Room Temperature Deformation in “Soft” Orientation Nial Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R.D. Field ,
D.F. Lahrman  and
R. Darolia
R.D. Field
Affiliation:
Engineering Materials Technology Laboratories, Ge Aircraft Engines 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45215
D.F. Lahrman
Affiliation:
Engineering Materials Technology Laboratories, Ge Aircraft Engines 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45215
R. Darolia
Affiliation:
Engineering Materials Technology Laboratories, Ge Aircraft Engines 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45215
Get access

Abstract

A detailed study of deformation of NiAl single crystals in two soft orientations, <110> and <111>, has been conducted. The Schmid factor favors {100} slip in the former and {110} slip in the latter. Detailed dislocation analysis, critical resolved shear stress measurements, and slip trace analysis have been performed to determine the nature of dislocation motion and interactions in this material. Particular attention is given to prismatic loops formed during deformation, since the shapes of these loops reveal the active slip planes. Similar loop morphologies observed in elevated temperature [001] oriented tensile specimens are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 213: Symposium Q – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV , 1990 , 255
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ball, A. and Smallman, R.E., Acta metall. 14, 1349 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ball, A. and Smallman, R.E., Acta metall. 14, 1517 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Wasilewski, R.J., Butler, S.R., and Hanlon, J.E., Trans. AIME 239, 1357 (1967).Google Scholar
4. Pascoe, R.T. and Newey, C.W.A., Met. Sci. J. 2, 138 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Pascoe, R.T. and Newey, C.W.A., Phys. Stat. Sol. 29, 357 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Potter, D.I., Mater. Sci. Eng. 5, 201 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mendiratta, M.G. and Law, C.C., J. Mat. Sci. 22, 607 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Johnson, W.G. and Gilman, J.J., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 632 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Tetelman, A.S., Acta Met. 10, 813 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Fraser, H.L., Smallman, R.E., and Loretto, M.H., Phil. Mag. 28, 651 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Fraser, H.L., Smallman, R.E., and Loretto, M.H., Phil. Mag. 28, 667 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Loretto, M.H. and Wasilewski, R.J., Phil. Mag. 23, 1311 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Field, R.D., Lahrman, D.F., and Darolia, R., submitted for publication to Acta metall.Google Scholar
14. Lloyd, C.H. and Loretto, M.H., Phys. Stat. Sol. 39, 163 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar