Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T05:13:14.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of Interfaces in Coarsening and Grain Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. P. Marsh  and
M. E. Glicksman
S. P. Marsh
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375–5000
M. E. Glicksman
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180–3590
Get access

Abstract

Theories of late-stage phase separation are discussed from the perspective of statistical mean-field approaches, whereby the material interfaces are assumed to interact with the appropriate average microstructural environment. For coarsening of two- and three-dimensional phases, recent progress is presented for selecting the most appropriate averages that characterize the microstructural environment surrounding a domain. The effective mean field, as well as the average interaction distance over which transport occurs, may be determined self-consistently by imposing global constraints that reflect the microstructural phase fractions and by using explicit spatial and ensemble averages of the matrix transport fields. Comparison of new theoretical coarsening rates with liquid-phase sintering experiments show good agreement over a wide range of phase fractions. Extension of this approach to grain growth, which involves more complex topological interactions, is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 229: Symposium Q – Structure/Property Relationships for Metal/Metal Interfaces , 1991 , 333
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Voorhees, P.W., J. Stat. Phys. 38 (1/2), 231 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Thompson, C.V., Acta Metall. 26(11), 2929 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys. 59 (4), 1341 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Lifshitz, I.M. and Slyozov, V.V., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12 (1/2), 35 (1961).Google Scholar
5. Wagner, C., Z. Elektrochem 65, 581 (1961).Google Scholar
6. Tsumuraya, K. and Miyata, Y., Acta Metall. 31 (3), 437 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Chakraverty, B.K., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 2401 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Atwater, H. A. and Yang, C.M., J. Appl. Phys. 67(10), 6202 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Marqusee, J.A., J. Chem. Phys. 81 (2), 976 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Brailsford, A.D. and Wynblatt, P., Acta Metall. 27, 489 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Marsh, S.P. and Glicksman, M.E., in Simulation and Theory of Evolving Microstructures, edited by Anderson, M.P. and Rollett, A.D. (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1990), p. 167.Google Scholar
12. Marsh, S.P. and Glicksman, M.E., in Evolution of Thin-Film and Surface Microstructure edited by C.V. Thomson, J.Y. Tsao and D.J. Srolovitz (Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings Series vol. 202) (in press).Google Scholar
13. Marsh, S.P., Ph.D. dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1989).Google Scholar
14. Kuklinsli, R., Smith, R.N., Glicksman, M.E. and Marsh, S.P., in Modeling of Casting. Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes V , edited by M. Rappaz and W. Kurz (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, Pa.) (in press).Google Scholar
15. Hardy, S.C. and Voorhees, P.W., Met. Trans. A 19A, 2713 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Courtney, T., private communication.Google Scholar
17 Atkinson, H.V., Acta Metall. 36(3), 469 (1988).Google Scholar
18. Lücke, K., Abbruzzese, G., and Heckelmann, I., in Recrystallization ‘90 , edited by Chandra, T. (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1990), p. 37.Google Scholar