Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:00:22.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Release of Technetium from Defense Waste Processing Facility Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W. L. Ebert ,
S. F. Wolf  and
J. K. Bates
W. L. Ebert
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
S. F. Wolf
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
J. K. Bates
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

Laboratory tests are being conducted using two radionuclide-doped Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) glasses (referred to as SRL 131A and SRL 202A) to characterize the effects of the glass surface area/solution volume (SN) ratio on the release and disposition of Tc and several actinide elements. Tests are being conducted at 90°C in a tuff ground water solution at S/V ratios of 10, 2000, and 20,000 m−1 and have been completed through 1822 days. The formation of certain alteration phases in tests at 2000 and 20,000 m−1 results in an increase in the dissolution rates of both glasses. The release of Tc parallels that of B and Na under most test conditions and its release increases when alteration phases form. However, in tests with SRL 202A glass at 20,000 m−1, the Tc concentration in solution decreases coincidentally with an increase in the nitrite/nitrate ratio that indicates a decrease in the solution Eh. This may have occurred due to radiolysis, glass dissolution, the formation of alteration phases, or vessel interactions. Technetium that was reduced from Tc(VII) to Tc(IV) may have precipitated, though the amount of Tc was too low to detect any Tc-bearing phases. These results show the importance of conducting long-term tests with radioactive glasses to characterize the behavior of radionuclides, rather than relying on the observed behavior of nonradioactive surrogates.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 221
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ebert, W. L., Bates, J. K., Buck, E. C., and Bradley, C. R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited by Interrante, C. G. and Pabalan, R. T., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 569–576.Google Scholar
2. Ebert, W. L. and Bates, J. K., Nuclear Technol. 104(3), 372–384 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Bradley, D. J., Harvey, C. O., and Turcotte, R. P., Leaching of Actinides and Technetium from Simulated High-Level Waste Glass, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-3152, 1979.Google Scholar
4. Fillet, S., Nogues, J., Vernaz, E., and Jacquet-Francillon, N., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L. O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 211–218.Google Scholar
5. Bazan, F., Rego, J., and Aines, R. D., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, edited by Bates, J. K. and Seefeldt, W. B. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) pp. 447–458.Google Scholar
6. Bibler, N. E. and Jurgensen, A. R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M. J. and Westerman, R. E. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) pp. 585–593.Google Scholar
7. Vernaz, E. Y. and Godon, N., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVM, edited by Sombret, C. G. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, New York, 1992) pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
8. Test Method for Static Leaching of Monolithic Waste Forms for Disposal of Radioactive WasteASTM Standard C 1220-92, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1992).Google Scholar
9. Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear Waste Glasses: The Product Consistency Test (PCT)ASTM Standard C 1285-94, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1994).Google Scholar
10. Ebert, W. L., Bates, J. K., Buck, E. C., Gong, M., and Wolf, S. F., in Ceramic Transactions Vol.45, Environmental and Waste Management Issues in the Ceramics Industry, pp. 231–241 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Wronkiewicz, D. J., Wang, L. M., Bates, J. K., and Tani, B. S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited by Interrante, C. G. and Pabalan, R. T., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 183–206.Google Scholar
12. Rard, J. A., Critical Review of the Chemistry and Thermodynamics of Technetium and Some of Its Inorganic Compounds and Aqueous Species, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-53440 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Vandergraaf, T. T., Ticknor, K. V., and George, I. M., in Geochemical Behavior of Disposed Radioactive Waste, edited by Barney, G. S., Navratil, J. D., and Schulz, W. W., ACS Symposium Series 246, (American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C., 1984) pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
14. Buddemeier, R. W., Finkel, R. C., Marsh, K. V., Ruggieri, M. R., Rego, J. H., and Silva, R. J., Radiochimica Acta 52/53, 275–282 (1991).Google Scholar