Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T08:01:13.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recognizing the Limits of Archaeological Applications of Non-Destructive Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Obsidians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Paul D. Bouey*
Affiliation:
Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., P.O. Box 413, Davis, CA 95617
Get access

Abstract

Application of a non-destructive energy-dispersive XRF technique, involving use of analytc/Compton net peak ratios, has greatly increased the analytical potential for the study of obsidians in archaeological assemblages. Contrary to reported conclusions for obsidians from the Coso Volcanic Field of southeastern California, however, the method lacks the precision associated with powdered-specimen, thin film, and other more rigorous techniques. Tests have shown that changing the orientation and/or placement of an archaeological artifact in a sample slot will produce widely divergent determinations of ppm concentrations for most specimens. These results indicate that discriminating between some chemical subsources at Coso cannot be accomplished reliably.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bacon, C.R., MacDonald, R., Smith, R.L., and Baedecker, P.A., J. Geo. Rsch. 86 (B1l), 1022310241 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Hughes, R.E., Geoarch. 3, 253265 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Bacon, C.R., MacDonald, R., Smith, R.L., and Baedecker, P.A., J. Geo. Rsch. 86 (B1l), 1022310241 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Duffield, W.A., Bacon, C.R., and Dalrymple, G.B., ibid., 85 (B5), 2381-2404 (1980); G. Roquemore, ibid., 85, 2434-2440 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Weaver, C.S. and Hill, D.P., Pure App. Geophys. 117, 5164 (1978/1979).Google Scholar
6. Walter, A.W. and Weaver, C.S., J. Geophys. Rsch. 85, 24412458 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Babèock, J.W. and Wise, W.S., Geo. Soc. Amer. Abstr. Programs 5 (1973); C.R. Bacon, WA. Duffield, and K. Nakamura, I. Geophys. Rsch. 85, 2425-2433 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Bacon, C.R., MacDonald, R., Smith, R.L., and Baedecker, P.A., J. Geo. Rsch. 86 (B1l), 1022310241 (1981).Google Scholar
10. ibid., p. 10229.Google Scholar
11. Hughes, R.E., Geoarch. 3, 253265 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Lamphere, M.A., Dalrymple, G.B., and Smith, R.L., Geo. 3, 339341 (1975).Google Scholar
13. Hughes, R.E., Geoarch. 3, p. 258 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Andermann, G. and Kemp, J.W., Anal. Chem. 30 (8), 13061309 (1958); E.P. Bertin, Introduction to X-ray Spectrometric Analysis, (Plenum Press, New York, 1978), pp. 294-298; K.K. Nielsen, Adv. X-ray Anal. 22, 303-315 (1979), p. 304.Google Scholar
15. Bertin, E.P., Introduction to X-ray Spectrometric Analysis, (Plenum Press, New York, 1978), p. 296.Google Scholar
16. ibid., p. 297.Google Scholar
17. Andermann, G. and Kemp, J.W., Anal. Chem. 30 (8), 13061309 (1958); E.P. Bertin, Introduction to X-ray Spectrometric Analysis, (Plenum Press, New York, 1978); R. Jenkins, R.W. Gould, and D. Gedcke, Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry, (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1981); K.K. Nielsen, Adv. X-ray Anal. 22, 303-315 (1979); F.H. Schamber, in X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Environmental Samples, edited by T.G. Dzubay (Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, 1977).Google Scholar
18. Jenkins, R., Gould, R.W., and Gedcke, D., Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry, (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1981), p. 463; K.K. Nielsen, Adv. X-ray Anal. 22, 303-315 (1979), pp. 304, 306.Google Scholar
19. Govindaraju, K., Geostnds. News. 8 (1984).Google Scholar
20. Bertin, E.P., Introduction to X-ray Spectrometric Analysis, (Plenum Press, New York, 1978), p. 280.Google Scholar