Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:28:23.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-Time Spectroscopic Ellipsometry of Sputtered CdTe Thin Films: Effect of Ar Pressure on Structural Evolution and Photovoltaic Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Michelle Nicole Sestak
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Jian Li
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Naba Raj Paudel
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Kristopher Wieland
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Jie Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Courtney Thornberry
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Robert Collins
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Alvin Compaan
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Toledo, Physics and Astronomy, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Get access

Abstract

In this study, 1 μm thick polycrystalline CdTe films were deposited by magnetron sputtering using a variable argon pressure, 2.5 ≤ pAr ≤ 50 mTorr, and a fixed substrate temperature, Ts = 230°C. Real time spectroscopic ellipsometry (RTSE) was performed during deposition in order to analyze the nucleation and coalescence, as well as the evolution of the surface roughness thickness ds with bulk layer thickness db and the depth profile in the void volume fraction fv. A linear correlation was found between the final ds value measured by RTSE at the end of deposition and the root-mean-square (rms) surface roughness measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) ex situ after deposition. A monotonic decrease in RTSE-determined roughness thickness is observed with decreasing Ar pressure from 18 to 2.5 mTorr. The lowest pressure also leads to the greatest bulk layer structural uniformity; in this case, fv increases to 0.04 with increasing CdTe thickness to 1 μm. The photovoltaic performance of CdTe films prepared with the lowest pressure of pAr = 2.5 mTorr is compared with that of previously optimized CdTe solar cells with pAr = 10 mTorr.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Messier, R. Giri, A.P. and Roy, R.A. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 500 (1984).Google Scholar
[2] Plotnikov, V. Vasko, A. Compaan, A.D. Liu, X. Wieland, K. Zeller, R. Li, J. and Collins, R.W. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (MRS, Warrendale PA, 2009), Vol. 1165, Art. No. 1165-M09-01.Google Scholar
[3] Li, J. Stoke, J.A. Podraza, N.J. Sainju, D. Parikh, A. Cao, X. Khatri, H. Barreau, N. Marsillac, S. Deng, X. and Collins, R.W. in: Photovoltaic Cell and Module Technologies, edited by Roedern, B. von and Delahoy, A.E. (SPIE, Bellingham, 2007), Vol. 6651, Art. No. 6651–07.Google Scholar
[4] Aspnes, D. E. Am. J. Phys. 50, 704(1981).Google Scholar
[5] Li, J. Chen, J. Podraza, N.J. and Collins, R.W. Conf. Record of the IEEE 4th World Conf. on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion 2006, (IEEE, Piscataway NJ, 2006) p. 392.Google Scholar
[6] Lee, J. Rovira, P.I. An, I. and Collins, R.W. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 1800(1998).Google Scholar
[7] Johs, B. Woollam, J.A. Herzinger, C.M. Hilfiker, J.N. Synowicki, R. and Bungay, C. Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., Crit. Rev. 72, 29(1999).Google Scholar
[8] Wu, X. Sheldon, P. Mahathongdy, Y. Ribelin, R. Mason, A. Moutinho, H.R. and Coutts, T.J. AIP Conf. Proc. 462, 37(1999).Google Scholar
[9] McCandless, B. E. and Sites, J. R. in: Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, edited by Luque, A. and Hegedus, S. (John Wiley and Sons, 2003) p. 632.Google Scholar
[10] Niklasson, G.A. Granqvist, C.G. and Hunderi, O. Appl. Opt. 20, 26(1981).Google Scholar