Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T03:06:20.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real and Reciprocal Space Imaging of Radiation-Induced Defects in BCC Fe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

R. E. Stoller ,
G. E. Ice  and
R. I. Barabash
R. E. Stoller
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831–6118
G. E. Ice
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831–6118
R. I. Barabash
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831–6118
Get access

Abstract

It is important to determine the number and configuration of point defects that survive atomic displacement cascades in irradiated materials since only those defects that escape recombination are able to contribute to radiation induced property changes such as void swelling, hardening, embrittlement, and irradiation creep. Simulations of displacement cascades using molecular dynamics are being used to provide a description of the most probable surviving defects. In the case of interstitial-type defects in iron, these are predicted to be <110> and <111> type dumbbells and <111> crowdions, along with small clusters of these same defects. Diffuse x-ray and neutron scattering provides a direct method for obtaining detailed information on the displacement fields both near to and far away from the defects in addition to information on the particular position of the defect. To analyze such radiation damage with diffuse scattering we have modeled reciprocal space diffraction from crystals with variously oriented dumbbells and small clusters. Diffuse scattering measurements between and close to Bragg reflections are sensitive to the orientation of the dumbbells, and the size and type of the small clusters at sizes that are too small to analyze by electron microscopy. Displacement of the near neighbors induces diffuse scattering in regions between the Bragg peaks, whereas the long range part of the displacement field results in Huang scattering close to the Bragg reflections. Simulation of diffuse scattering by different interstitial defects around (h00), (hh0), (hhh), (3h,h, 0) reflections demonstrates that each defect type leads to distinct isointensity contours. These scattering signatures can be used to determine the type and configuration of the surviving interstitials.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 757: Symposium II – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI , 2002 , II4.13
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stoller, R. E. and Calder, A. F., J. Nucl. Mater. 283–287, 746–752 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Phythian, W. J., Stoller, R. E., Foreman, A. J. E., Calder, A. F., and Bacon, D. J., J. Nucl. Mater. 223, 245 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Stoller, R. E., Odette, G. R., and Wirth, B. D., J. Nucl. Mater. 251, 49–69 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Stoller, R. E., J. Nucl. Mater. 276, 22–32 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Bacon, D. J., Gao, F., and Osetsky, Yu. N., J. Nucl. Mater. 276 (2000) 1–12.Google Scholar
6. Caturla, M. J., Soneda, N., Alonso, E., Wirth, B. D., Diaz de la Rubia, T., and Perlado, J. M., J. Nucl. Mater. 276, 13–21 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Nordlund, K. and Averback, R. S., J. Nucl. Mater. 276, 194–201 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Haubold, H.G., Revue de Physique Appliquee 11, 73–81 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Larson, B.C., J. Appl. Cryst. 8, 150–160 (1975).Google Scholar
10. Larson, B.C. and Young, F.W. Jr, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 104, 273–286 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Larson, B.C. and Schmatz, W., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 99, 267–275 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Schonfeld, B. and Ehrhart, P., Phys. Rev. B. 19, 3905–3910 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Franz, H., Wallner, G. and Peisl, J., Rad. Eff. and Def. in Solids 128, 189–204 (1994).Google Scholar
14. Abe, H. and Kuramoto, E., J. Nucl. Mater. 283–287, 174–178 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Peisl, H., J. Appl. Cryst. 8, 143–149 (1975).Google Scholar
16. Stoller, R. E., “The Impact of Mobile Defect Clusters in a Kinetic Model of Pressure Vessel Embrittlement,” Effects of Radiation on Materials, ASTM STP-1325, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 15–29, 1999.Google Scholar