Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:04:30.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactivation of Acceptors and Trapping of Hydrogen in GaN/InGaN Double Heterostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

V. Krishnamoorthy
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
R. G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Hughes Research Laboratories, Malibu, CA 90265
F. Ren
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
R. A. Stall
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873
Get access

Abstract

The apparent thermal stability of hydrogen passivated Mg acceptors in GaN is a function of the annealing ambient employed, with H2 leading to a reactivation temperature approximately 150°C higher than N2. The dissociation of Mg-H complexes and the loss of hydrogen from GaN are sequential processes, with reactivation occurring at ≤700°C for annealing under N2, while significant concentrations of hydrogen remain in the crystal even at 900°C in implanted samples. The hydrogen is gettered to regions of highest defect density such as the InGaN layer in a GaN/InGaN double heterostructure. The addition of an accelerating potential for 2H+ ions in the plasma did not greatly affect the deuterium profiles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nakamura, S., Iwasa, N., Senoh, M. and Mukai, T., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1258 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Yuan, C., Salagaj, T., Gurary, A., Zawadzki, P., Chen, C.S., Kroll, W., Stall, R.A., Yi, W., Schurman, M., Hwang, C.Y., Mayo, W.E., Lu, Y., Pearton, S.J., Krisnakutty, S. and Kolbas, R.M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 1163 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Amano, H., Kito, M., Hiramatsu, K. and Akaski, I., J. Appl. Phys. 28, L112 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Pearton, S.J., Shul, R.J., Wilson, R.G., Ren, F.. Zavada, J.M., Abernathy, C.R., Vartuli, C..B., Lee, J.W., Mileham, J.R. and MacKenzie, J.D., J. Electron. Mater. 25, 845 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Nakamura, S., Senoh, M., Nagahama, S., Iwasa, N., Yannada, T., Matsushita, T., Kyoku, H. and Sugimoto, Y., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 35, L74 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Zavada, J.M. and Wilson, R.G., Mat. Sci. Tor. 148/149, 189 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Estreicher, S.K., Mat. Sci. Eng. Dep. R 14, 319 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Pankove, J.I. and Johnson, N.M. (eds.), Semiconductors and Semimetals Vol. 34 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1991).Google Scholar
9. Pearton, S.J., Corbett, J.W. and Stavola, M., Hydrogen in Crystalline Semicond. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelber, 1992).Google Scholar
10. Johnson, N.M., Doland, C., Ponce, F., Walker, J. and Anderson, G., Physica B170, 3 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Chevallier, J. and Aucouturier, M., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 18, 219 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Mathiot, D., Phys. Rev. B 40, 5869 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Polyakov, A.Y., Stam, M., Li, A.Z. and Milnes, A.G., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 120, 83 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Ringel, S.A. and Chalberhjee, B. (in press); Chatterjee, B., Ringal, S.A., Sieg, R., Hoffman, R. and Weinberg, I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 58 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Chabrabarti, U.K., Pearton, S.J., Hobson, W.S., Loparta, J. and Swaminathan, V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 887 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Pearton, S.J., Wu, C.S., Stavola, M., Ren, F., Loparta, J. and Dautremont-Smith, W.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 496 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Hiramatsu, K., Itoh, S., Amano, H., Akaski, I., Kuwano, N., Shiraishi, T. and Oki, K., J. Cryst. Growth 115, 628 (1991).Google Scholar
18. Pearton, S.J., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 8, 1247 (1994).Google Scholar
19. Brandt, M.S., Ager, J.W., Gotz, W., Johnson, N.M., Harris, J.S., Molnar, R.J. and Moustakas, T.D., Phys. Rev. B 49, 14758 (1994).Google Scholar
20. Neugebauer, J. and Van der Walle, C.G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4452 (1995).Google Scholar