Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:00:07.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radionuclide Release from the Kbs-3 Repository-Sensitivity to the Variability of Materials and Other Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

L. Romero ,
Å. Andersson ,
L. Moreno  and
I. Neretnieks
L. Romero
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyRoyal Institute of TechnologyS-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Å. Andersson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyRoyal Institute of TechnologyS-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
L. Moreno
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyRoyal Institute of TechnologyS-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
I. Neretnieks
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyRoyal Institute of TechnologyS-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Radionuclides leaking from a canister spread into the backfill material surrounding the canister and then migrate through different pathways into the mobile water in the rock fractures. In order to quantify uncertainties regarding the release to the far field, a sensitive analysis is performed for the uncertainties in the parameters governing the release.

For nuclides escaping through a damaged canister in a repository of the type KBS-3 [1], most nuclides migrate through the pathways appointing to the fracture intersecting the deposition hole and the disturbed zone below the tunnel.

The sensitivity analysis showed that the grade of impact on the release of uncertainties in the parameters cannot be generalized for all nuclides, however, some patterns of the influence can be given. Uncertainties in the hole size and uranium solubility for nuclides embedded in the matrix have a strong influence on the release. The adsorption capacity of the bentonite surrounding the canister and the hydraulic properties of the fractured rock in the short pathways to the mobile water have to be accurately known to reduce uncertainties in the release to the far field. For nuclides with a high diffusion coefficient in the bentonite, e.g. cesium and strontium, the hydraulic properties of the fractured rock nearest to the canister have to be well known. For the iodide, on the other hand, with a very low diffusion coefficient, uncertainties in the hydraulic properties have a very small effect on the release. The uranium release with a very high inventory is not affected by uncertainties in the hydraulic properties of the rock.

The released nuclide fraction through each pathway is not largely influenced by uncertainties in the transport properties of the backfill materials whereas uncertainties in the water flow rates in the zones in the rock where the water flows, have a strong influence on the nuclide release distribution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 353: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII , 1994 , 511
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 KBS-3., 1983. Final storage of spent nuclear fuel. Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Co., Stockholm.Google Scholar
2 Romero, L., Moreno, L. and Neretnieks, I., 1992. Compartment model “NUTRAN” (User’s Manual) version 1.0, April 1994. KAT 94/20, Dept. of Chem. Eng. and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
3 SKB-91, 1992. Final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Importance of the bedrock for safety. SKB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co) Technical report, TR 92–20. Stockholm.Google Scholar
4 Neretnieks, I., 1979. Transport mechanism and rates of transport of radionuclides in the geosphere as related to the Swedish KBS-concept. In Proceedings of the Symposium “Underground disposal of radioactive wastes”, Vol II. p 108, OTANIEMI, 2–6 July 1979, IAEA.Google Scholar
5 Box George, E.P., 1978. “Statistics for experimenters”. Madison, Wisconsin, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
6 Brandberg, F. and Skagius, K., 1991. Porosity, sorption and diffusivity data compiled for the SKB 91 study. SKB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co) Technical report, TR 91–16. Stockholm.Google Scholar
7 Bruno, J. and Sellin, P., 1992. Radionuclide solubilities to be used in SKB 91. SKB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co) Technical report, TR 92–13. Stockholm.Google Scholar
8 Wiborgh, M. and Lindgren, M., 1987. Database for the radionuclide transport calculations for SFR. SKB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co) Progress report SFR 87–09. Stockholm.Google Scholar
9 Romero, L., Moreno, L. and Neretnieks, I., 1993. Analysis of radionuclide release from the canister. KAT 93/18, Dept. of Chem. Eng. and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar