Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:22:33.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proton Diffusion in Hydrated Acceptor-Doped Barium Zirconate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Dirk Wilmer ,
Tilo Seydel  and
Klaus-Dieter Kreuer
Dirk Wilmer
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Münster, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Corrensstr. 30, Münster, 48149, Germany
Tilo Seydel
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, 38042, France
Klaus-Dieter Kreuer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart, 70569, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Quasielastic neutron scattering experiments have been performed on proton-conducting hydrated Y-doped BaZrO3 at temperatures between 473 K and 673 K. Quasielastic broadening is observed at all temperatures, but only at the higher ones the scattering exhibits the characteristics of the proton transport process. Attempts to interpret our data in the framework of the two-state model yield unconvincing results. A simpler approach using the isotropic Chudley-Elliott model yields reasonable values for the proton self-diffusivities but also unusually high values for the jump distance which are close to the mean distance between dopants.

Keywords

neutron scatteringceramicdiffusion
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 972: Symposium AA – Solid-State Ionics—2006 , 2006 , 0972-AA01-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Münch, W., Kreuer, K.-D., Seifert, G., Maier, J., Solid State Ionics 136–137, 183 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Kreuer, K.D., Chem. Mat. 8, 610 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Kreuer, K.D., Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 333 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Pionke, M., Mono, T., Schweika, W., Springer, T., Schober, T., Solid State Ionics 97, 497 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Matzke, T., Stimming, U., Karmonik, C., Soetramo, M., Hempelmann, R., Güthoff, F., Solid State Ionics 86–88, 621(1996).Google Scholar
6. Münch, W., Seifert, G., Kreuer, K.D., Maier, J., Solid State Ionics 86–88, 647 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Münch, W., Seifert, G., Kreuer, K.D., Maier, J., Solid State Ionics 97, 39 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Karmonik, C., Hempelmann, R., Matzke, Th., Springer, T., Z. Naturforsch. 50a (1995) 539.Google Scholar
9. Kreuer, K.D., Solid State Ionics 125, 285 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Kreuer, K.-D., Adams, St., Münch, W., Fuchs, A., Klock, U., Maier, J., Solid State Ionics 145, 295 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Richter, D., Springer, T., Phys. Rev. B 18, 126 (1978).Google Scholar
12. Chudley, C.T., Elliott, R.J., Proc. Royal Soc. (London) 77, 353 (1961).Google Scholar
13. Björketum, M. E., Sundell, P.G., Wahnström, G., Engberg, D., Solid State Ionics 176, 3035 (2005).Google Scholar