Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:56:13.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of Epitaxial SrTiO3 Thin Films Grown on Silicon by Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Z. Yu
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
R. Droopad
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
J. Ramdani
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
J.A. Curless
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
C.D. Overgaard
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
J.M. Finder
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
K.W. Eisenbeiser
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
J. Wang
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
J.A. Hallmark
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
W.J. Ooms
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Research Laboratories, Motorola Labs, 2100 E. Elliot Road, Tempe, AZ 85284
Get access

Abstract

Single crystalline perovskite oxides such as SrTiO3 (STO) are highly desirable for future generation ULSI applications. Over the past three decades, development of crystalline oxides on silicon has been a great technological challenge as an amorphous silicon oxide layer forms readily on the Si surface when exposed to oxygen preventing the intended oxide heteroepitaxy on Si substrate. Recently, we have successfully grown epitaxial STO thin films on Si(001) surface by using molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) method. Properties of the STO films on Si have been characterized using a variety of techniques including in-situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED), ex-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The STO films grown on Si(001) substrate show bright and streaky RHEED patterns indicating coherent two-dimensional epitaxial oxide film growth with its unit cell rotated 450 with respect to the underlying Si unit cell. RHEED and XRD data confirm the single crystalline nature and (001) orientation of the STO films. An X-ray pole figure indicates the in-plane orientation relationship as STO[100]//Si[110] and STO(001)// Si(001). The STO surface is atomically smooth with AFM rms roughness of 1.2 AÅ. The leakage current density is measured to be in the low 10−9 A/cm2 range at 1 V, after a brief post-growth anneal in O2. An interface state density Dit = 4.6 × 1011 eV−1 cm−2 is inferred from the high-frequency and quasi-static C-V characteristics. The effective oxide thickness for a 200 Å STO film is around 30 Å and is not sensitive to post-growth anneal in O2 at 500-700°C. These STO films are also robust against forming gas anneal. Finally, STO MOSFET structures have been fabricated and tested. An extrinsic carrier mobility value of 66 cm2 V−11 s−1 is obtained for an STO PMOS device with a 2 μm effective gate length.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Tokumitu, E., Itani, K., Moon, B. and Ishiwara, H., Mater Res. Soc. Proc. 361, 427432 (1995).10.1557/PROC-361-427Google Scholar
2 Sanchez, F., Varela, M., Queralt, X., Aguiar, R. and Morenza, J.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61(18), 22282230 (1992).10.1063/1.108276Google Scholar
3 McKee, R.A., Walker, F.J. and Chisholm, M.F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(14), 30143017 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3014Google Scholar
4 Tambo, T., Nakamura, T., Maeda, K., Ueba, H. and Tatsuyama, C., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (part 1) 37(18), 4454–9 (1998).10.1143/JJAP.37.4454Google Scholar
5 Sanchez, F., Aguiar, R., Trtik, V., Guerrero, C., Ferrater, C. and Varela, M., J. Mater Res. 13(6), 1422–5 (1998).10.1557/JMR.1998.0202Google Scholar
6 Nakagawara, O., Kobayashi, M., Yoshino, Y., Katayama, Y., Tabata, H. and Kawai, T., J. Appl. Phys. 78(12), 7226–30 (1995).10.1063/1.360433Google Scholar
7 Moon, B.K. and Ishiwara, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33(3A) (part 1), 1472–77 (1994).10.1143/JJAP.33.1472Google Scholar
8 Mori, H. and Ishiwara, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30(8A), L1415–L1417 (1991).10.1143/JJAP.30.L1415Google Scholar
9 Yu, Z., et al. , (in preparation).Google Scholar