Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:04:42.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pressure-Induced Migration of Ferroelectric Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Alex Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Haifa University at Oranim, Tivon 36910, Israel
Simon Dorfman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Israel Institute of Technology - Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The study of the migration of the first-order paraelectric-ferroelectric interfaces in BaTiO3 under the hydrostatic pressure is provided in the framework of the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory. The analytical solution describing the interphase boundary is applied for the calculations of its width and velocity at different pressures. The calculations are based on the experimental data for BaTiO3. The parameters of the power law of the temperature and pressure dependences of the interface velocity under the temperature and pressure were obtained. Using the BaTiO3 example we illustrate the ability of the suggested approach in the description of the kinetics of the first-order ferroelectric phase transition in perovskites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Dec, J., Ferroelectrics 69, 181 (1986); J. Phys. C 21, 1257 (1988); Ferroelectrics 89, 193 (1989).Google Scholar
[2] Pomeau, Y., Physica D 23, 3 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Gordon, A., Physica B 138, 239 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Fridkin, V. M., Ferroelectrics 117, 11 (1991).Google Scholar
[5] Marder, M., Phys. Rev. A 45, R2158 (1992).Google Scholar
[6] Gordon, A., Solid State Commun. 83, 389 (1992).Google Scholar
[7] Blinc, R. and Žekš, B., Soft Modes in Ferroelectrics and Antiferroelectrics, North-Holland Publ. Comp., New York, 1974.Google Scholar
[8] Samara, G. A. and Peercy, P. S., Solid State Physics, Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D., eds. (Academic Press, New York), vol. 36, p. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
[9] Gordon, A., Phys. Lett. A 99, 329 (1983).Google Scholar
[10] Samara, G., Ferroelectrics, 73, 145 (1987).Google Scholar
[11] Samara, G., Phys. Rev. 151, 378 (1966).Google Scholar
[12] Samara, G., Ferroelectrics, 2, 277 (1971).Google Scholar
[13] Clarke, R. and Benguigui, L., J. Phys. C, 10, 1963 (1977).Google Scholar
[14] Gordon, A., Vagner, I. D., and Wyder, P., Physica B 191, 210 (1993).Google Scholar
[15] Wemple, S. H., DiDomenico, M. Jr., and Camlibel, I., J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 29, 1797 (1968).Google Scholar
[16] Merz, W. J., Phys. Rev. 91, 513 (1953).Google Scholar
[17] Ginzburg, V. L., Soy. Phys. Solid State 2, 1123 (1960).Google Scholar
[18] Sche, R. W., Denner, W. and Schultz, H., Mat. Res. Bull., 16, 497 (1981).Google Scholar
[19] Burfoot, J. C. and Parker, B. J., Brit J. Appl. Phys. 17, 213 (1966).Google Scholar
[20] Dec, J. and Yurkevich, V. E., Ferroelectrics 110, 77 (1990).Google Scholar