Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:51:55.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting Efflorescence and Subflorescences of Salts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Rosa Espinosa ,
Lutz Franke  and
Gernod Deckelmann
Rosa Espinosa
Affiliation:
[email protected], Princeton University, Dept. Civil & Env. Eng., Eng. Quad E-320, Princeton, NJ, 08544, United States, 609-258-5433
Lutz Franke
Affiliation:
[email protected], Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Building Materials, Physics and Chemistry of Buildings, Eissendorfer Strasse 42, Hamburg, 21071, Germany
Gernod Deckelmann
Affiliation:
[email protected], Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Building Materials, Physics and Chemistry of Buildings, Eissendorfer Strasse 42, Hamburg, 21071, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Crystallization of salts is a common cause of damage in porous building materials. Understanding of the crystallization mechanism of salts is important in order to prevent or avoid the problem. Subflorescence of salts (i.e., crystallization within the pores of the body) can induce scaling and cracking, while efflorescence (i.e., crystallization in a film of solution on the exterior surface of the body) does not generally affect the coherence and endurance of the building materials.

In this paper, we deal with the crystallization behavior of two salts, sodium sulfate and sodium chloride, in two bricks with different capillary porosity. The results reveal quite different crystallization behavior depending on salt and substrate.

The supersaturation of the solution is induced in our experiments by evaporation. Indeed, the main reason for the different behavior of these salts is the different ability for supersaturation. Thus, the sodium sulfate solution is prone to be much more supersaturated than sodium chloride. Furthermore, the solution transport, which depends on salt properties, material porosity, pore-clogging and climatic conditions, affects the position of the drying front and, with it, the crystallization front leading to the formation either of efflorescence or of subflorescence. A simulation of the experiments helps us to understand the effect of the influencing factors on the crystallization pattern. Therefore, considering both factors, supersaturation ratio and solution transport, it is possible to predict the different crystallization behavior observed in the experiments.

Keywords

nucleation & growthporositysimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1047: Symposium Y – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology VIII , 2007 , 1047-Y04-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Samson, E.; Marchand, J.: Numeric Solution of the extended Nernst-Planck Model, In: Journal of colloid and interface science 215 (1999), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
2. Gunstmann, C.: Rechnerische Simulation von Söurekorrosionsprozessen zementgebundener Materialien. PhD, Hamburg University of Technology, 2007 Google Scholar
3. Espinosa, R. M., Franke, L., Deckelmann, G.: Phase changes of salts in porous materials, “Construction and Building materials, Elsevier”, 2007 in press.Google Scholar
4. Scherer, G. W.: Stress from crystallization of salt, Cement and Concrete Research 34 (2004) 1613–1624 Google Scholar
5. Espinosa, R. M., Franke, L., Deckelmann, G.: Damage due to phase changes of salts in porous materials. Proceedings of 5th International Essen Workshop: Transport in Concrete: Nano-to-Macrostructure, 2007.Google Scholar
6. Franke, L., Kiekbusch, J., Espinosa, R., Gunstmann, C.: Cesa und Astra-two program systems for cement and salt chemistry and the prediction of corrosion processes in concrete. Proceedings of 5th International Essen Workshop: Transport in Concrete: Nano-to-Macrostructure, 2007.Google Scholar
7. Christian, J.W., The theory of transformation in metals and alloys, Part I: Equilibrium and General Kinetic Theory, 2nd edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975.Google Scholar
8.CRC, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, 83rd Edition, 2002-2003Google Scholar
9. Bear, J. Dynamics of fluids in Porous Media. Dover Pubn Inc, 1988.Google Scholar
10. Sunagawa, I: Crystals: growth, morphology and perfection. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
11. Rodriguez-Navarro, C., Doehne, E.: Salt weathering: influence of evaporation rate, supersaturation and crystallization pattern. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24 (1999) 191–209.Google Scholar
12. Abramzon, A., Gaukhberg, R.: Surface Tension of Salt solutions. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, Vol. 66 (6, 7 and 8), part 2, 1993.Google Scholar