Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:58:33.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen Vacancies at the γ-Al2O3/STO Heterointerface Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2015

Thong Q. Ngo
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Martin D. McDaniel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Agham Posadas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Alexander A. Demkov
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
John G. Ekerdt
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We report the epitaxial growth of γ-Al2O3 on SrTiO3 (STO) substrates by atomic layer deposition (ALD). The ALD growth of γ-Al2O3 on STO(001) single crystal substrates was performed at a temperature of 345 °C. Trimethylaluminum and water were used as co-reactants. In-situ reflection high-energy electron diffraction and ex-situ x-ray diffraction were used to determine the crystallinity of the Al2O3 films. In-situ x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to characterize the Al2O3/STO heterointerface. The formation of a Ti3+ feature is observed in the Ti 2p spectrum of STO after the first few ALD cycles of Al2O3 and even after exposure of the STO substrate to trimethylaluminum alone at 345 °C. The presence of a Ti3+ feature is a direct indication of oxygen vacancies at the Al2O3/STO heterointerface, which provide the carriers for the quasi-two dimensional electron gas at the interface.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ohtomo, A., Hwang, H. Y., Nature, 427, 423426 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H. Y., Iwasa, I., Kawasaki, M., Keimer, B., Nagaosa, N., Tokura, Y., Nat. Mater. 11, 103113 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyren, N., Bibes, M., Lesne, E., George, J.-M., Deranlot, C., Collin, S., Barthélémy, A., Jaffrès, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 186802, 15 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannhart, J., Schlom, D. G., Science, 327, 16071611 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, N., Hwang, H. Y., Muller, D. A., Nat. Mater. 5, 204209 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Pryds, N., Kleibeuker, J. E., Koster, G., Sun, J., Stamate, E., Shen, B., Rijnders, G., Linderoth, S., Nano Lett. 11, 37743778 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. V., Liu, Y., Heo, J., Gordon, R. G., Nano Lett. 12, 47754783 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, M. D., Posadas, A., Wang, T., Demkov, A. A., Ekerdt, J. G., Thin Solid Films, 520(21), 65256530 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, R. S., Snyder, R. L., Acta Cryst. B, 47, 617 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, A. W., Claus, J. W., Johnson, J. M., George, S. M., Thin Solid Films, 292, 135 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar