Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:18:17.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of Reactor Geometry and Growth Conditions for GaN Halide Vapor Phase Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. A. Safvi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
N. R. Perkins
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
M. N. Horton
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
A. Thon
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
D. Zhi
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
T. F. Kuech
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
Get access

Abstract

A numerical model of an experimental gallium nitride horizontal vapor phase epitaxy reactor is presented. The model predicts the flow, concentration profiles, and growth rates. The effects of flowrate variation and geometry on the growth rate, growth uniformity and crystal quality were investigated. Numerical model predictions are compared to experimentally observed values. Parasitic gas phase reactions between group III and group V sources and deposition of material on the wall are shown to lead to reduced overall growth rates and inferior crystal quality. A low ammonia concentration is correlated to deposition of polycrystalline films. An optimum HVPE growth process requires selection of reactor geometry and operating conditions to minimize parasitic reactions and wall deposition while providing a uniform reactant distribution across the substrate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zhang, X., Kung, P., Saxler, A., Walker, D., Wang, T.C., and Razeghi, M., AppI. Phys. Lett. 67(12), 1745 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., Sawaki, N., and.Akasaki, I., J. Crystal Growth 137 p. 170174 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Shaw, D.W., J.Crystal Growth 31 (1975) 130.Google Scholar
4. Maruska, H., and Tietjen, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 15 p.327 (1969).Google Scholar
5. Lagerstedt, O. and Monemar, B., J. Appl. Phys., 45 p. 22662272 (1974).Google Scholar
6. Beccard, R., Beuven, S., Heime, K., Schmald, R., Jurgensen, H., Harde, P., and Schlak, M., J. Crystal Growth 121 (1992) 373.Google Scholar
7. Mochizuki, Y., Usui, A., Handa, S. and Takada, T., J. Crystal Growth 148 (1995) 96105.Google Scholar
8. Perkins, N.R., Horton, M.N. and Kuech, T.F., MRS Proceedings, 1995.Google Scholar
9 Bird, R.B. et al., Stewart, W.E. and Lightfoot, E.N., Transport Phenomenon, Wiley, New York (1960)Google Scholar
10. Perry, R.H. & Chilton, C.H., Chemical Engineer's Handbook, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1977).Google Scholar
11. Reid, R.C., Prausnitz, J.M. and Sherwood, T.K., The Properties of Gases and Liquids, McGraw-Hill, New York (1977).Google Scholar
12. Safvi, S.A. and Kuech, T.F., Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
13. Mountziaris, T.J., Kalyanasundram, S. and Ingle, N.K., J. Cryst. Growth, 131, 283 (1993).Google Scholar
14. Hirschfelder, J.O. Curtiss, C.F. and Bird, R.B., Molecular Theory. of gases and Liquids, Wiley, New York (1967).Google Scholar
15. Strang, G. & Fix, G., An Analysis of the Finite Element Method, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1973).Google Scholar
16. Ban, V., J. Electrochem Soc., 119, 761 (1972).Google Scholar