Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:38:04.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal Growth of InGaAs/InAlAs Distributed Bragg Reflectors Lattice-matched on InP Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. W. Choi
Affiliation:
Electronics and ‘Telecommunications Research Institute P.O. Box 106, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Republic of Korea
J. H. Lee
Affiliation:
Electronics and ‘Telecommunications Research Institute P.O. Box 106, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Republic of Korea
J. H. Baek
Affiliation:
Electronics and ‘Telecommunications Research Institute P.O. Box 106, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Republic of Korea
E. H. Lee
Affiliation:
Electronics and ‘Telecommunications Research Institute P.O. Box 106, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Republic of Korea
B. Lee
Affiliation:
Electronics and ‘Telecommunications Research Institute P.O. Box 106, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Republic of Korea
Get access

Abstract

Distributed Bragg reflectors composed of InGaAs/InAlAs alternating layers have been grown on InP substrates by MOCVD. To obtain high performance, the growth condition has been traded off between surface roughness and crystal quality. Using in-situ laser reflectometry, the precise control of layer thickness and composition has been achieved for reproducible DBR growth. The optimal mirror performance and sharp interfaces have been observed in the DBR grown at 650'C. In order to avoid band-edge absorption 6% of Al has been added to In 0.53Ga0.47As to produce quarternary In0.53Ga 0.41Al 0.06As/InAlAs Bragg reflector exhibiting high reflectivity at 1.55 μm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wakita, K., Kotaka, I., Mitomi, O., Asai, H., Kawamura, Y. and Naganuma, M., J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 1027 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Otsubo, K., Shoji, H., Fujii, T., Matsuda, M. and Ishikawa, H., Japan. J. Appl. phys. 34, L227 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Babic, D.I., Dudley, J.J., Streubel, K., Mirin, R.P., Bowers, J.E. and Hu, E.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1030 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Guy, P., Woodridge, K. and Hopkinson, M., Electron. Lett. 29, 1947 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Weber, J.P., Malloy, K. and Wang, S., IEEE Photon. Tech. Lett., 2, 162 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Frateschi, N.C., Hummel, S.G., and Dapkus, P.D., Electron. Lett. 27, 155 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Fritz, I.J., Olsen, J.A., Howard, A. J., Brennan, T.M., Hammons, B.E. and Vawter, G.A., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 30, 452 (1994).Google Scholar