Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:21:21.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optically Nonlinear Films of Amphiphilic Polymers: Synthesis, Langmuir-Blodgett Deposition, and Optical Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Robert C. Hall
Affiliation:
Polymer Science Branch, Chemistry Division, Research Department, Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA 93555
Geoffrey A. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Brian Anderson
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Tephen T. Kowel
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Brian G. Higgins
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Pieter Stroeve
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access

Abstract

Novel polymers are synthesized by attaching amphiphilic dye groups along a hydrophilic polyether backbone. These polymers are fabricated into noncentrosymmetric films by the Langmuir-Blodgett (L/B) technique. Stacks of molecular bi-layers are assembled by γ-type deposition, interleaving two different dye-substituted polymers. One polymer has the dye's molecular dipole pointing toward the backbone, while in the other polymer, the dye points in the opposite direction. Light from a Nd:YAG laser is passed through these films and the second harmonic is detected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1a. Kowel, S.T., et al., Thin Solid Films 152, 377 (1987).Google Scholar
1b. Garito, A.F., et al., Proc. SPIE 682, 2 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Garito, A.F., et al., Mol. Cryst. & Liq. Cryst. 106, 219 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Smith, S.D., Nature 316, 319 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Neff, J.A., Opt. Eng. 26 (1), 2 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Ulrich, D., Opt. Eng. Reports July (5A), (1987).Google Scholar
6. Kowel, S.T., et al., Opt. Eng. 26 (2), 107 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Garito, A.F. and Singer, K. D., Laser Focus 18, 59 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Williams, D.J., editor, Am. Chem. Soc. Symposium Series 233 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Williams, D.J., Angew. Chem. Intl. 23, 690 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Carter, G.M., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43 (10), 15 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Carter, G.M., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47( 5), 457 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Stamatoff, J. B., et al., Proc. SPIE, 682, 85 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Shen, Y.R., The Principles of Nonlinear Optics, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
14. Girling, I.R., et al., Thin Solid Films 132, 101 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Hayden, L.M., et al., Opt. Comm. 61 (5), 35 (1987).Google Scholar
16. Stroeve, P., et al., Thin Solid Films 146, 209 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kowel, S.T., et al., Opt. Eng. 26 (2),717 (1987).Google Scholar
18. Hall, R. C., et al., Proc. SPIE, 824, (1987).Google Scholar
19. Pugh, C. and Percec, V., Macromol. 19 (1), 65 (1986).Google Scholar
20. Hayden, L.M., Davis, U.C. Ph.D. Thesis, 1987.Google Scholar
21. Laschewsky, A., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 788 (1987).Google Scholar
22. Gaines, G.L. Jr., Insoluble Monolayers at Liquid-Gas Interfaces, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1966).Google Scholar