Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:00:15.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Novel Methods to Reduce Pattern Size and Pitch for Data Storage Using Electron Beam Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Zhou Lu
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Electrical Engineering Department, 119 Bonner Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, United States, 716-6453123, 716-6453656
A. N. Cartwright
Affiliation:
[email protected], University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Electrical Engineering Department, 119 Bonner Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, United States, 716-6453123, 716-6453656
Get access

Abstract

Pattern size and pitch are two major factors that directly affect the capacity of a data storage unit. Electron beam lithography, because it can be used for direct writing at the nanometer scale, is one of the potential candidates to fabricate ultra-fine and ultra-compact patterns for the next generation of data storage media.

In the paper, we present methods to reduce the pattern size and pitch written by electron beam on positive tone resist Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA). The first method uses a writing dose which is much lower than the critical dose of the PMMA. However, in this technique, the distance between the adjacent writing spots (which are approximately Gaussian in spatial extent) is finely adjusted until the partially overlapping Gaussian functions form a contour with periodic dose peaks higher than the critical dose. This overlapping exposure results in a periodic exposure of the PMMA. Most importantly, this writing strategy, using the overlapping of low dose Gaussian beams, results in patterns with smaller size and pitch compared to the conventional methods that use a higher writing dose than the critical dose. To further improve the results, we use ultrasonic development in combination with cold development to greatly increase the resist contrast. The increased contrast results in smaller pattern sizes, and enables smaller pattern pitches, as well as improving pattern uniformity and reproducibility.

Finally, as a demonstration of the technique using a conventional beam voltage of 15kV, we achieve ultra-fine and high density patterns with ∼10nm linewidths and 50nm in pitch, which corresponds to a storage capacity near 200 billion bits/inch2. In comparison, standard techniques (using a dose slightly higher than the critical dose and normal development strategy), we can only obtain patterns with linewidths of about 20-30nm and pitch of about 100nm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Word, M.J. and Adesida, I., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 21(6), 1071 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Krauss, P. and Chou, S.Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13(6), 2850 (1995).Google Scholar
3. New, R.M.H., Pease, R.F.W., and White, R.L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13(3), 1089(1995).Google Scholar
4. Wu, W., Jonckheere, R., Tokei, Z., Brongersma, S.H., Hove, M.V., and Maex, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 22(4),1071 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Maile, B.E., Henschel, W., Kurz, H., Rienks, B., Polman, R. and Kaars, P., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol.39, 6836 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Hu, W., Sarveswaran, K., Lieberman, M., Bernstein, G.H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 22(4), 1711 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Chen, W. and Ahmed, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B11(6), 2519(1993).Google Scholar
8. Rai-Choudhury, P., SPIE Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabrication. Vol. 1. 1997: SPIE. 768.Google Scholar
9. Thompson, L. F., Willson, C. G., and Bowden, M. J., Introduction to Microlithography. 1994: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
10. Ocola, L. E., Stein, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 24(6): 3061 (2006).Google Scholar
11. Ryan, J.M., Hoole, A.C.F., and Broers, A.N. Ryan, J. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13(6), 3035(1995).Google Scholar
12. Chen, W. and Ahmed, H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62(13), 1499 (1993).Google Scholar