Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:24:03.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural Occurrence and Stability of Pyrochlore in Carbonatites, Related Hydrothermal Systems, and Weathering Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Gregory R. Lumpkin
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Private Mail Bag 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
Anthony N. Mariano
Affiliation:
48 Page Brook Road, Carlisle, MS 01741, USA
Get access

Abstract

Stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric (defect) pyrochlores crystallize during the magmatic and late magmatic-hydrothermal phases of carbonatite emplacement (T > 450–550 °C, P < 2 kb). Defect pyrochlores can also form at low temperatures in laterite horizons during weathering. After crystallization, pyrochlore is subject to alteration by hydrothermal fluids (T ∼ 550-200°C) and ground water. Alteration occurs primarily by ion exchange of low valence A-site cations together with O, F, and OH ions. The high valence cations Th and U are generally immobile; however, we have documented one example of hydrothermal alteration involving loss of U together with cation exchange at the B-site in samples from Mountain Pass, California. During laterite accumulation, the cation exchange rate of pyrochlore greatly exceeds the rate of matrix dissolution. The exceptional durability of pyrochlore in natural environments is related to the stability of the B-site framework cations. In carbonatites, defect pyrochlores may contain significant amounts of Si (up to 7.6 wt% SiO2) which is negatively correlated with Nb.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., Amer. Mineral. 77, 179188 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., Amer. Mineral. 80, 732743 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Harker, A.B., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988) p. 335392.Google Scholar
4 Ball, C.J., Buykx, W.J., Dickson, F.J., Hawkins, K., Levins, D.M., Smart, R.St.C., Smith, K.L., Stevens, G.T., Watson, K.G., Weedon, D., and White, T.J., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 72, 404414 (1989).Google Scholar
5 Hayakawa, I. and Kamizono, H., J. Nucl. Mater. 202, 163168 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Heinrich, E.Wm., The Geology of Carbonatites (Krieger, Huntington, NY, 1980).Google Scholar
7 Aleksandrov, I.V., Trusikova, T.A., and Tupitsin, B.P., in Recent Contributions to Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, edited by Tugarinov, A.I. (Wiley, New York, 1975) pp. 335344.Google Scholar
8 James, T.C. and McKie, D., Mineral. Mag. 31, 889900 (1958).Google Scholar
9 Subramanian, M.A., Aravamudan, G., and Rao, G.V. Subba, Prog. Solid State Chem. 15, 55143 (1983).Google Scholar
10 Gieré, R., Terra Nova 2, 6067 (1990).Google Scholar
11 Braun, J.-J., Pagel, M., Herbillon, A., and Rosin, C., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 44194434 (1993).Google Scholar
12 Lumpkin, G.R., Hart, K.P., McGlinn, P.J., Payne, T.E., Gieré, R., and Williams, C.T., Radiochim. Acta 66/67, 469474 (1994).Google Scholar