Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:55:06.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple-Scan E-Beam Method Applied to a Range of Semiconducting Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

N.J. Shah
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
R.A. Mcmahon
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
J.G.S. Williams
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
H. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the conditions for activating ion implants in a range of semiconductor materials in the solid state. This includes phosphorus and arsenic implants into silicon, boron and phosphorus implants into SOS, gallium into germanium and silicon into gallium arsenide. For each material the restoration of electrical activity correlates with structural data from RBS analysis. Negligible implant diffusion occurs for the typical annealing treatments which result in full activation of dopants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ferris, S.D., Leamy, H.J. and Poate, J.M., Eds., Laser-solid interactions and laser processing – 1978, AIP Conference Proceedings, 50 (AIP, New York 1979)Google Scholar
2. McMahon, R.A., Ahmed, H., Dobson, R.M. and Speight, J.D., Characterisation of the multiple-scan electron beam annealing method Electron. Letts.,16, 295 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Smith, B.J. & Stephen, J., Handbook of ion-implantation data, AERE Report Number R9363 (AERE, Harwell 1972).Google Scholar
4. Csepregi, L., Kennedy, E.F., Mayer, J.W. and Sigmon, T.W., Substrateorientation dependence of the epitaxial regrowth rate from Si-implanted amorphous Si, J. Appl.Phys., 49, 3906 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Shah, N.J., Ahmed, H., Sanders, I.R. and Singleton, J.F., Activation of low dose silicon implants in GaAs by multiply scanned electron beams, Electron. Letts., 16, 433 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar