Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T10:00:48.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modification of the Hydriding of Uranium using Ion Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. G. Musket ,
G. Robinson-Weis  and
R. G. Patterson
R. G. Musket
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermore, California 94550
G. Robinson-Weis
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermore, California 94550
R. G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermore, California 94550
Get access

Abstract

The hydriding of depleted uranium at 76 Torr hydrogen and 130°C has been significantly reduced by implantation of oxygen ions. The high-dose implanted specimens had incubation times for the initiation of the reaction after exposure to hydrogen that exceeded those of the non-implanted specimens by more than a factor of eight. Furthermore, the nonimplanted specimens consumed enough hydrogen to cause macroscopic flaking of essentially the entire surface in times much less than the incubation time for the high-dose implanted specimens. In contrast, the ion-implanted specimens reacted only at isolated spots with the major fraction of the surface area unaffected by the hydrogen exposure.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 27: Symposium E – Ion Implantation and Ion Beam Processing of Materials , 1983 , 753
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Mueller, W.M., Blackledge, J.P., and Libowitz, G.G. (editors), Metal Hydrides (Academic Press, NY, 1968).Google Scholar
2. Mackay, K.M., Hydrogen Compounds of the Metallic Elements (E.&F.N. Spon Ltd., London, 1966).Google Scholar
3. Biersack, J.P. and Haggmark, L.G., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Patterson, R.G. and Musket, R.G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
5. Bloch, J. and Mintz, M.H., J. Nucl. Mater. 110, 251 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Bloch, J. and Mintz, M.H., J. Less-Common Met. 81, 301 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Musket, R.G., Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
8. Condon, J.B., J. Phys. Chem. 79, 42 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Condon, J.B., J. Less Common Metals 73, 105 (1980).Google Scholar