Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:56:31.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure Evolution of Al-1.5% Cu Alloy as a Function of Resistance Change Due to Isothermal DC Stressing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T Lee
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
M Schade
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
A Merino
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
J Lee
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
C Christenson
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
C Varker
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
K Evans
Affiliation:
SPS-SCG, Motorola Inc., MD:P004, 5005 E. McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ, 85008
Get access

Abstract

This paper investigates Cu segregation and void morphology along AlCu alloy metal lines as a function of resistance change resulting from isothermal DC stressing at 225°C and a current density of J=2×106 A/cm2. The Al-1.5wt.%Cu alloy was deposited via DC magnetron sputtering onto a Si substrate at 525°C with a 1500Å TiW barrier layer. NIST test structures (length = 800µm, thickness = 1.2µm, width = 5 and 10 µm) were utilized in this study. BPSG was used as the insulation layer between Si substrate and conductor. The surface passivation layer was composed of Si3N4/PSG. Various failure criteria were selected to explore the correlation between Cu segregation and void morphology along the metal line and the relative percent resistance change (ΔR/R). The log-normal plots, mean-times-to-failure, and sigmas at each ΔR/R ( -−%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 100%, 250%) were plotted and listed. The microstructural evolution in terms of void morphology was monitored using SEM. SEM-EDS was used to analyze the Cu concentrations along metal lines tested at various %ΔR criteria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Agarwala, B., Digiacomo, G., Joseph, R., Thin Solid Films vol.34, no. 1 p. 165–9 (1976)Google Scholar
[2] Canali, C., Fantini, F., Zanoni, E., Giovannetti, A., Brambilla, P., Microelectronics and Reliability vol.24, no.1 p. 77100 (1984)10.1016/0026-2714(84)90641-3Google Scholar
[3] Shaw, T., Hu, C., Lee, K., Rosenberg, R., Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VI. Symposium p. 187–99 (1996)Google Scholar
[4] Gall, M., Jawarani, D., Kawasaki, H., Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VI. Symposium, p.81–6 (1996)Google Scholar
[5] Lloyd, J., Clement, J., Applied Physics Letters vol.69, no. 17 p. 2486–8 (1996)Google Scholar
[6] Shih, W., Ghiti, A., Low, K., Greer, A., O'Neill, A., Walker, J., Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VI. Symposium p.249–54 (1996)Google Scholar
[7] Hu, C., Ho, P, Small, M., Kelleher, K., Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics Symposiun p.99105 (1991)Google Scholar
[8] Frear, D., Michael, J., Kim, C., Romig, A., Morris, J., Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering vol. 1596 p.7282 (1991)Google Scholar
[9] Theiss, S., Prybyla, J., Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VI. Symposium p.207–12 (1996)Google Scholar
[10] Lee, T, York, B, Lindgren, B, Kentzinger, H., Lee, J, Christenson, C.. Varker, C, Evans, K. data will be presented at the 1998 MRS Srping MeetingGoogle Scholar