Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:00:41.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure and Local Charge Distribution in Hydrogenated Nanocrystalline Silicon under Illumination Studied by Electrostatic Force Microscopy.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2013

Rubana Bahar Priti  and
Venkat Bommisetty
Rubana Bahar Priti
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
Venkat Bommisetty
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H) is a promising absorber material for photovoltaic applications. Nanoscale electrical conductivity and overall electronic quality of this material are significantly affected by film microstructure, specifically the density and dimension of grains and grain-boundaries (GB). Local charge distribution at grains and grain/GB interfaces of nc-Si:H was studied by Electrostatic Force Microscopy (EFM) in constant force mode under illumination of white LED. Bias voltage from -3V to +3V was applied on the tip. Scanning Kelvin Force (KFM) images were taken before and after illumination to study the change in surface photovoltage (SP). EFM and KFM analysis were combined with film topography to draw a correlation between surface morphology and nanoscale charge distribution in this material. After illumination, small blister like structures were observed whose size and density increase with time. Raman spectroscopy confirmed these new structures as nanocrystalline silicon. This change was assumed due to relaxation of strained Si-Si bonds as an effect of photo response. Nanocrystalline grain interiors were at lower potential and amorphous grain boundaries were at higher potential for negative bias; it was opposite for positive bias. Change in polarity in bias voltage reversed the polarity of the potential in grains and GBs indicating the dominance of negative type of defects. Further study with current sensing AFM in dark and illumination with variable bias voltages will be able to identify the type and density of defects in grains and grain/GB interfaces.

Keywords

grain boundariesscanning probe microscopy (SPM)photovoltaic
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1493: Symposium E/H – Photovoltaic Technologies, Devices and Systems Based on Inorganic Materials, Small Organic Molecules and Hybrids , 2013 , pp. 201 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gleiter, H., “Nanocrystalline Materials,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 33, pp. 223–315, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wronski, C. R., Pearce, J. M., Koval, R. J., Ferlauto, A. S., and Collins, R. W., “Progress in Amorphous Silicon Based Solar Cell Technology,” in RIO 02-World Climate & Energy Event, 2002, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
Staebler, D. L. and Wronski, C. R., “Reversible conductivity change in discharge produced amorphous silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 31, pp. 292–294, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, J., Fluckiger, R., Keppner, H., and Shah, A., “Complete microcrystalline p‐i‐n solar cell—Crystalline or amorphous cell behavior?,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 65, pp. 860–865, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocka, J., Stuchlıkova, H., Stuchlık, J., Rezek, B., Mates, T., Svrcek, V., et al. ., “Model of transport in microcrystalline silicon,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 299–302, pp. 355–359, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G. Y., Connell, R. F., He, Y. L., and Yu, M. B., “Electronic conductivity of hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 78, pp. 3945–3948, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, G., Yan, B., Yang, J., and Guha, S., “Effect of electrical bias on metastability in hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon solar cells,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 86, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, B., Yue, G., Owens, J. M., Yang, J., and Guha, S., “Light-induced metastability in hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon solar cells,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 85, pp. 1925–1927, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridger, P. M., Bandic, Z. Z., Piquette, E. C., and McGill, T. C., “Measurement of induced surface charges, contact potentials, and surface states in GaN by electric force microscopy,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 74, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasconcelos, J. S., Vasconcelos, N. S. L. S., Orland, M. O., Bueno, P. R., Varela, J. A., Longo, E., et al. ., “Electrostatic force microscopy as a tool to estimate the number of active potential barriers in dense non-Ohmic polycrystalline SnO2 devices,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 89, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, S., Dutta, P., Baroughi, M. F., Bommisetty, V., and Galipeau, D., “Title,” unpublished.Google Scholar
Gheno, S. M., Kiminami, R. H. G. A., Morelli, M. R., and Filho, P. I. P., “Electric force microscopy investigations of barrier formations in ZnO-based varistors,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 30, pp. 549–554, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar