Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T02:50:42.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural and Chemical Components of Ceramic-Metal Interfacial Fracture Energies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. M. Cannon ,
V. Jayaram ,
B. J. Dalgleish  and
R. M. Fisher
R. M. Cannon
Affiliation:
Center For Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
V. Jayaram
Affiliation:
Center For Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
B. J. Dalgleish
Affiliation:
Center For Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
R. M. Fisher
Affiliation:
Center For Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Failure of ceramic-metal interfaces induced by residual or applied stress is often brittle in nature although plastic strain in one or more bonding layers may add to the fracture energy for decohesion. Thus, the fracture toughness depends on chemical bonding across the interface, the plasticity and flow stress of the metal as well as other factors, arising from local internal stresses and the microstructure of the ceramic-metal couple, that cause crack tip branching, deflection, bridging, blunting or shielding. Electron microscopy and DCB testing of metal-glass systems provide insights into the relative importance of factors that determine the decohesion resistance.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 72: Symposium G – Electronic Packaging Materials Science II , 1986 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cannon, R.M., Fisher, R.M., and Evans, A.G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol.54, 799 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Drory, M.D., Thouless, M.D., and Evans, A.G., “Driving Force for Thin Film Delamination,” to be published.Google Scholar
3. Evans, A.G. and Hutchinson, J.W., Int. J. Solids Struct. 20, 455 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Fisher, R.M., “Growth Stresses and Delamination of Vapour-Deposited Cr Films,” to be published.Google Scholar
5. Fisher, R.M., Martin, B., and Cannon, R.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol.54, 829 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cannon, R.M., Adv. in Ceram., 10, 818 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Cannon, R.M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 64, 449 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Kim, K.-S., “Elasto-Plastic Analysis of the Peel Test,” T. & A. M. Report No. 472, Univ. of Ill. (March 1985).Google Scholar
9. Faber, K.T. and Evans, A.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 255 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Henning, C.A.O., Boswell, F.W., and Corbett, J.M., Acta Met, 23, 177 (1975).Google Scholar