Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:04:51.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microscale Fracture Toughness Testing of TiAl PST Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Daisuke Miyaguchi ,
Masaaki Otsu ,
Kazuki Takashima  and
Masao Takeyama
Daisuke Miyaguchi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kumamoto University, Materials Science & Engineering, Kumamoto, Japan
Masaaki Otsu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kumamoto University, Materials Science & Engineering, Kumamoto, Japan
Kazuki Takashima
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kumamoto University, Materials Science & Engineering, Kumamoto, Japan
Masao Takeyama
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tokyo Institute of Technology, Department of Metallurgy & Ceramics Science, Tokyo, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A microscale fracture testing technique has been applied to examine the fracture properties of lamellar in TiAl PST crystals. Micro-sized cantilever specimens with a size ˜ 10×20×50 μm3 were prepared from Ti-48Al two-phase single crystals (PST) lamellar by focused ion beam (FIB) machining. Notches with a width of 0.5 μm and a depth of 5 μm were also introduced into the specimens by FIB. Two types of notch directions (interlamellar and translamellar) were selected when introducing the notches. Fracture tests were successfully completed using a mechanical testing machine for micro-sized specimens at room temperature. The fracture toughness (KQ) values of the interlamellar type specimens were obtained in the range 1.5–3.6 MPam1/2, while those of the translamellar specimens were 5.0–8.1 MPam1/2. These fracture toughness values are lower than those having been previously reported in conventional TiAl PST samples. For macro-sized specimens, extrinsic toughening mechanisms, including shear ligament bridging, act in the crack wake, and the crack growth resistance increases rapidly with increasing length of crack wake for lamellar structured TiAl alloys. In contrast, the crack length in microsized specimens is only 2–3 μm. This indicates that extrinsic toughening mechanisms are not activated in micro-sized specimens. This also indicates that intrinsic fracture toughness can be evaluated using microscale fracture toughness testing.

Keywords

fracturetoughnessmicrostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1128: Symposium U – Advanced Intermetallic-Based Alloys for Extreme Environment and Energy Applications , 2008 , 1128-U05-14
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schafrik, R. E., in Proceedings of third International Symposium on Structural Intermetallics (ISSI 3), edited by Hemker, K. J., Dimiduk, D. M., et al. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2002), pp. 1317.Google Scholar
2. Pather, R., Wisbey, A., Partridge, A., Halford, T., Horspool, D. N., Bowen, P. and Kestler, H., in Proceedings of third International Symposium on Structural Intermetallics (ISSI 3), edited by Hemker, K. J., Dimiduk, D. M., et al. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2002), pp. 207–215.Google Scholar
3. Kim, Y., Acta Metall., 40, 1121 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Ritchie, R. O., In. J. Fracture, 100, 55 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Nakano, T., Kawanaka, T., Yasuda, H. Y. and Umakoshi, Y., Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 194, 43 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Yokoshima, S. and Yamaguchi, M., Acta Metall. Mater., 44, 873 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Chan, K. S., Metall. Trans. A, 24A, 569 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Chan, K. S. and Kim, Y. W., Acta Metall., 43, 439 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Takahima, K., Higo, Y., Sugiura, S. and Shimojo, M., Mat. Trans., 42, 68 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Takashima, K. and Higo, Y., Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater Strct., 28, 10 (2005).Google Scholar
11. Tuchiya, T., Hirata, M., Chiba, N., Udo, R., Yoshitomo, Y., Ando, T., Sato, K., Takashima, K., Higo, Y., Saotome, Y., Ogawa, H. and Ozaki, K., J. Microelectromech. Syst., 14, 1178 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Zhang, G. P., Takashima, K. and Higo, Y., Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 426, 95 (2006).Google Scholar
13. Halford, T. P., Takashima, K., Higo, Y. and Bowen, P., Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 28, 695 (2005).Google Scholar
14. Takashima, K., Halford, T. P., Rudinal, D. and Higo, Y., Takeyama, M., in Integrative and Interdisciplinary Aspects of Intermetallics, edited by Mills, M. J., Inui, H., Clemens, H., Fu, C-L., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 842, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005), pp. S5.44.1–6.Google Scholar
15. Okamura, H., Introduction to Linear Fracture Mechanics, (Baifukan, Tokyo, 1976) pp. 218 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
16. Halford, T.P., Fatigue and Fracture of a High Strength, Fully Lamellar γ-TiAl based Alloy, PhD Thesis, The University of Birmingham, (2003).Google Scholar
17. Chan, K.S., Wang, P., Bhate, N. and Kumar, K. S., Acta Metall. Mater., 52, 4601 (2004).Google Scholar
18. Yoo, M. H. and Yoshimi, K., Intermetallics, 8, 1215 (2000).Google Scholar
19. Rao, K. T. V., Kim, Y. W., Muhlstein, C. L. and Ritchie, R. O., Mat. Sci. Eng., A, 192/193, 474 (1995).Google Scholar