Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:52:29.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms of Intergranular Fracture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Diana Farkas
Diana Farkas*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Virginia PolytechnicInstitute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access

Abstract

We present a study of the atomistic mechanisms of crack propagation along grain boundaries in metals and alloys. The failure behavior showing cleavage crack growth and/or crack-tip dislocation emission is demonstrated using atomistic simulations for an embedded-atom model. The simulations follow the quasi-equilibrium growth of a crack as the stress intensity applied increases. Dislocations emitted from crack tips normally blunt the crack and inhibit cleavage, inducing ductile behavior. When the emitted dislocations stay near the crack tip (sessile dislocations), they do blunt the crack but brittle cleavage can occur after the emission of a sufficient number of dislocations. The fracture process occurs as a combination of dislocation emission/micro-cleavage portions that are controlled by the local atomistic structure of the grain boundary. The grain boundary is shown to be a region where dislocation emission is easier, a mechanism that competes with the lower cohesive strength of the boundary region.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 539: Symposium M – Fracture & Ductile vs. Brittle Behavior - Theory, Modelling… , 1998 , 291
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wolf, D. On the relationship between symmetrical tilt, twist, “special,” and “favored” grain boundaries. Journal de Physique. 1985; 46, (4): C4–197.Google Scholar
2. Vitek, V. and Chen, S. P. Modeling of grain boundary structures and properties in intermetallic compounds. Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia. 1991; 25, 1237–1242.Google Scholar
3. Sih, G. C. and Liebowitz, H. Mathematical Theories of Brittle Fracture. Liebowitz, H. Fracture-An Advanced Treatise. New York: Academic Press; 1968; II, 69–189.Google Scholar
4. Farkas, Diana and Shastry, Vijay. Molecular statics simulation of fracture in Fe. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1996; 4, : 473–491.Google Scholar
5. Farkas, D.; Mutasa, B.; Vailhé, C., and Ternes, K. Interatomic potentials for B2 NiAl and martensitic phases. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1995; 3, 201–214.Google Scholar
6. Mishin, Yuri and Farkas, Diana. Atomistic simulation of point defects and diffusion in B2 NiAl: Part I. Point defect energetics. Phil. Mag. A. 1997; 75, (1): 169–185.Google Scholar
7. Petton, G. and Farkas, D. Grain boundary structure simulations in B2 ordered NiAl. Scripta Metall. 1991; 25, (1): 55–60.Google Scholar
8. Hagen, M. and Finnis, M. W. Determination of the Atomistic Structure of the å3 (111) Twin boundary in NiAI. Materials Science Forum. 1996; 207–209, 245–248.Google Scholar
9. Rice, J. R.; Beltz, G. E., and Sun, Y. Peirerls Framework for Dislocation Nucleation from a Crack Tip. In “Topics in Fracture and Fatigue”. Edited by Argon, A. S., 1992.Google Scholar