Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:09:07.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanics and Stability of Gold Nanoparticle-Oligo-Ligand-DNA Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2013

Letisha A. McLaughlin  and
Mohammed A. Zikry
Letisha A. McLaughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7910
Mohammed A. Zikry
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7910
Get access

Abstract

Systems in which DNA is adsorbed onto gold nanoparticles have the potential for applications in gene regulation therapies, drug delivery, sensing, and DNA scaffolding. However, the mechanical stability of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and interfacial behavior between the gold nanoparticles and thiol ligands are not well understood or quantified. The stability of DNA-AuNP) systems is, therefore, examined using a large-scale specialized finite-element approach with a dislocation-density based crystalline plasticity framework to model the AuNPs and an elastic description to model thiol ligands, DNA, and the ionic solution. For compressive loading conditions, the system exhibited morphological instabilities in the nanoparticles, as well as high stress and dislocation-density gradients at the thiol-nanoparticle attachment sites, which can affect system stability and attachment strength.

Keywords

nanostructuremicrostructureAu
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1513: Symposium GG – Mechanical Behavior of Metallic Nanostructured Materials , 2013 , mrsf12-1513-gg10-16
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Macfarlane, R.J., Lee, B., Jones, M.R., Harris, N., Schatz, G.C., Mirkin, C.A.. Science, 334, 204–208 (2011).10.1126/science.1210493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothemund, P.W.K.. Nature, 440, 297–302 (2006).10.1038/nature04586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, G., You, C.C., Kim, B.J., Turingan, R.S., Forbes, N.S., Martin, C.T., Rotello, V.M.. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 45, 3165–3169 (2006).10.1002/anie.200600214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosi, N.L, Giljohann, D.A., Thaxton, C.S., Lytton-Jean, A.K.R., Han, M.S., Mirkin, C.A.. Science, 312, 1027–1030 (2012).10.1126/science.1125559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsini, V.C., Zikry, M.A.. International Journal of Plasticity, 17, 1393–1417 (2001).10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00091-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmawi, W.M., Zikry, M.A.. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-Transactions of the ASME, 124, 88–96 (2002).10.1115/1.1421611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanthraj, P., Zikry, M.A.. International Journal of Plasticity, 34, 154–163 (2012).10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bustamante, C., Smith, S.B., Liphart, J., Smith, D.. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 10, 279–285 (2000).10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00085-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benham, C.J.. Biopolymers, 22, 2477–2495 (1983).10.1002/bip.360221112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensimon, D., Simon, A.J., Croquette, V., Bensimon, A.. Physical Review Letters, 74, 4754–4757 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, G.. Physical Review A, 34, 4467–4468 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevA.34.4467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elechiguerra, J.L., Reyes-Gasgab, J., Yacamán, M.J.. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 16, 3906–3919 (2006).10.1039/b607128gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yacamán, M.J., Ascencio, J.A., Liu, H.B., Gardea-Torresday, J.. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, 19, 1091–1103 (2001).10.1116/1.1387089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, A.S.. Computer Physics Communications, 182, 11–13 (2011).10.1016/j.cpc.2010.07.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar