Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:31:56.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Materials Science as a High School Capstone Course for the Physics First Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Nathan A. Unterman
Nathan A. Unterman*
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, Glenbrook North High School, Science, Northbrook, Illinois, United States
Get access

Abstract

By changing the high school science curriculum from Freshman Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics (BCP); to Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (PCB), we have an opportunity to create a new Senior level science elective. The entire high school science core curriculum has been reviewed and parts rewritten to create a coherent, integrated program based on common themes such as energy, particulate nature of matter, and forces. Nanoconcepts including size and scale and surface area to volume ratio are integrated where appropriate. In our school, we began PCB during the 2008-2009 academic year. In anticipation of these students becoming upperclassmen, a capstone elective course of Materials Science has been developed based on scientific models and literacies shaped in the PCB course sequence. Deployment of this new model centered course is set for the 2010-2011 school year.

Keywords

educationnanoscalegovernment interactions
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1233: Symposium PP – Materials Education , 2009 , 1233-PP07-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Workshop hosted by University of Michigan and SRI International, June 14–16, 2006, in Menlo Park, CA Google Scholar
2 , Stevens, Shawn, , Sutherland, Lee Ann, Schank, Patricia, and Krajcik, Joseph, The Big Ideas of Nanoscience, http://hi-ce.org/PDFs/Big_Ideas_of_Nanoscience-20feb07.pdf February 2007. Retrieved 15.September.2008.Google Scholar
3 American Association for the Advancement of Science, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
4 National Research Council, National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.Google Scholar
5http://www.nsf.gov/eng/general/publicdoc/nanotechnology.jsp 12.August.2009Google Scholar
6 Roco, M.C., International Strategy for Nanotechnology Research and Development, J. of Nanoparticle Research, Kluwer Academic Publ., Vol. 3, No. 5–6, pp. 353–360, 2001 Google Scholar
7 Mislevy, Robert J; Almond, Russell G; Lukas, Janice F., A Brief Introduction to Evidence-Centered Design. CSE Report 632, ERIC ED483399, US Department of Education, 2004.Google Scholar
8 Wilson, Mark, Constructing Measures: Item Response Modeling Approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 2005.Google Scholar
9[email protected]Google Scholar
10Nanoscience Concept Inventory has been developed with the NCLT and further information is available from the author.Google Scholar