Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:31:14.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Localized Charge Storage in CeO2/Si(111) By Electrostatic Force Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. T. Jones
Affiliation:
Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics 128–95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
P. M. Bridger
Affiliation:
Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics 128–95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
O. J. Marsh
Affiliation:
Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics 128–95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
T. C. McGill
Affiliation:
Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics 128–95, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Get access

Abstract

In this report, the local patterning of charge into CeO2/Si structures by scanning probe microscopy is examined. An electrostatic force microscope (EFM) has been used to write and image localized dots of charge on to double barrier CeO2/Si/CeO2/Si(lll) structures. By applying a large tip bias Vtip = 6 – 10 V and reducing the tip to sample separation to z = 3 – 5 nm for write times of t = 30 – 60 s, arrays of charge dots 60 – 250 nm FWHM have been written. The dependence of dot size and total stored charge on various writing parameters such as tip writing bias, tip to sample separation, and write time is examined. The total stored charge is found to be Q = 5 – 200 e per charge dot. These dots of charge are shown to be stable over periods of time greater than 24 hrs, with an initial charge decay time constant of τ ∼ 9.5 hrs followed by a period of much slower decay with τ > 24 hrs. Charge decay time constants are found to be dependent on the thickness of the lower CeO2 tunneling barrier.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Inoue, T.. Yamamoto, Y., Koyama, S., Suzuki, S.. Ueda, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1332 (1990).Google Scholar
[2]Luo, L., Wu, X., Dye, R.. Muenchausen, R., Foltyn, S., Coulter, Y., Maggiore, C., Inoue, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2043 (1991).Google Scholar
[3]Inoue, T., Yamamoto, Y., Satoh, M.. Ide, A., Katsumata, S., Thin Solid Films 281–282, 24 (1996).Google Scholar
[4]Chikyow, T., Bedair, S., Tye, L.. El-Masry, N.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1030 (1994).Google Scholar
[5]Yaegashi, S.. Kurihara, T., Hoshi, H., Segawa, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 270 (1994).Google Scholar
[6]Jones, J., Croke, E., Garland, C., Marsh, O., McGill, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 2686 (1998).Google Scholar
[7]Jones, J., Bridger, P., Marsh, O., McHill, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1326 (1999).Google Scholar
[8]Schaadt, D., Yu, E., Sankar, S.. Berkowitz, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 472 (1999).Google Scholar
[9]Sarid, Dror. Scanning Force Microscopy, Oxford University Press, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
[10]Nabhan, W., Equer, B.. Broniatowski, A., DeRosny, G., Rev. Sci. Inst. 68, 3108 (1997).Google Scholar
[11]Nonnenmacher, M., O'Boyle, M.P., Wickramasinghe, H.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2921 (1991).Google Scholar