Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T03:22:25.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Learning Curve Approach to Projecting Cost and Performance in Thin Film Photovoltaics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

George Cody  and
Thomas Tiedje
George Cody
Affiliation:
Exxon Research, Clinton Township, Route 22 East, Annandale N.J. 08801, [email protected]
Thomas Tiedje
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agriculture Road, Vancouver, British Columbia. V6TIZI, Canada, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The current cost of electricity generated by PV power is still extremely high with respect to utility power and there remain questions as to whether PV power can ever be competitive with electricity generated by fossil fuels. A previous paper by the authors supplied an objective framework for considering this important question and introduced analytical tools to define and project the technical/economic status of PV power through the year 2010. In this paper, we update this previous work in the context of the recent announcements by Amoco/Enron Solar of projected sales of PV power in 1997 at rates considerably less than the US average.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 426: Symposium J – Thin Films for Photovoltaic and Related Device , 1996 , 539
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cody, G. D., Tiedje, T., in Energy and the Environment, Abeles, B., Jacobson, A. J., Sheng, P., Eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 1992, pp. 147–217.Google Scholar
2. Epple, L. Argote, D., Science, 247, (1990) 920.Google Scholar
3. Maycock, P. D., Wakefield, G. F., Business Analysis of Solar Photvoltaic Energy Conversion, Eleventh IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference-1975 (IEEE, 1975).Google Scholar
4. Maycock, P., (personal communication, 1993).Google Scholar
5. Williams, R. H., The Outlook for Renewable Energy, 2nd MIT International Conference on the Next Generation of Nuclear Technology 10/25–26/93, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1993).Google Scholar
6. Williams, R. H., Terzian, G. A., Princeon Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, (1993)Google Scholar
7. Tiedje, T., Yablonovitch, E., Cody, G. D., Brooks, B. G., IEEE Transactions on Electon Devices, ED–31, (1984) 711–716.Google Scholar
8. Taylor, R., Utility Requirements of Photovoltaic Power Systems, 161 st Meeting of Electrochemical Society, Montreal, Canada (1982).Google Scholar
9. DeMeo, E., Taylor, R., Science, 224, (1984) 245.Google Scholar
10. Sabisky, E. S., Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells,, (1996)Google Scholar
11. Myerson, A. R., “Solar Power for Earthly Prices,” New York Times, Nov. 15, 1994, pp. D1–D2.Google Scholar
12. Press, Release, “Amoco Corporation and Enron Corporation Have Formed a General Partnership,” New York Times, December 19, 1994.Google Scholar
10. Rose, A., CHEMTECH, 11, (1981) 566–571.Google Scholar
13. Rose, A., CHEMTECH, 11, (1981) 694–697.Google Scholar
15. Mitchell, R., in NREL PV (1996), vol. Winter 1995/1996, p. 4.Google Scholar