Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:39:24.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ion Implanted Glassy Carbon - Comparison Wear Testing with Pyrolytic Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

John T. A. Pollock  and
Leszek S. Wielunski
John T. A. Pollock
Affiliation:
Csiro Division of Materials Science and Technology, PMB-7 Menai, NSW, 2234, Australia
Leszek S. Wielunski
Affiliation:
Csiro Division of Materials Science and Technology, PMB-7 Menai, NSW, 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Comparative wear data for unimplanted and implanted (50 keV, 5 × 1015 N+ cm−2) glassy carbon (GC) and pyrolytic carbon (PC) are reported. The implanted GC is about 120 times more resistant to diamond abrasion than unimplanted GC and at least 10 times more resistant than PC. In sliding tests, using a ruby ball as the abrader, the implanted GC is almost unaffected for the conditions employed (50 g load, 30,000 revs) compared with the unimplanted GC and unimplanted PC each of which endured measurable wear. The reasons for the enhancement of wear resistance and the ease with which 1–2 μm thick layers may be produced are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 110: Symposium M – Biomedical Materials and Devices , 1987 , 681
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Haubold, A.E., Shim, H.S. and Bokros, J.C. in Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials, Vol II (eds. Williams, D.F.), CRC Press, Florida, 1981, p. 3.Google Scholar
[2] Ion Implantation and Ion Beam Processing of Materials (eds. Hubler, , Holland, , Clayton, and White, ) North Holland New York, 1984, MRS Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
[3] McHargue, J.D., White, C.W., Appleton, B.R. and Williams, J.M.. Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials, Vol II (eds. D.F. Williams), CRC Press, Florida, 1981, p. 385.Google Scholar
[4] Dearnaley, G., - in Ion Implantation Metallurgy (eds. Preece, and Harvonen, ) 1979, AIME Tech Pub. p. 1.Google Scholar
[5] Pollock, J.T.A., Clissold, R.A. and Farrelly, M., J. Mat. Sci. Lett. 6 (1987) 1023.Google Scholar
[6] Pollock, J.T.A., Farrelly, M. and Wielunski, L.S.. To be published MRS Proc. Vol. No. 93 L.A. April, 1987 (eds. Gibson, , Pronko, and White, ).Google Scholar
[7] Shim, H.A. and Schoen, F.J., Biomater. Med. Dev. Artific. Org., 2, (1974) 103.Google Scholar
[8] Wielunski, L.S., Pollock, J.T.A. and Farrelly, M., Symposium A, Boston, MRS, November 1987.Google Scholar
[9] Potter, D.I., Symposium A, Boston, MRS, November 1987 ref. 2, p. 117.Google Scholar
[10] Devries, R.C., GE Report 86CRD247, March 1987, Schenectady, NY.Google Scholar
[11] Scott, M.D. and Pollock, J.T.A., unpublished.Google Scholar