Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:48:28.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Implantation Through Thin Silicon Dioxide Layers for Si-based Solid-State Quantum Computer Device Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jeffrey McCallum
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Swanston Street, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
Michael L. Dunn
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Melbourne, School of Physics, Swanston Street, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
Eric Gauja
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of New South Wales, School of Physics, NSW, Sydney, 2052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Ion implantation doping of Si through an SiO2 overlayer is of interest for fabrication of a range of devices on the pathway to development of a solid–state quantum computer (SSQC). The fabrication requirements of devices based on the Kane architecture typically involve implantation through a pre-existing thin device–quality thermal oxide at low fluences ∼1011 cm−2 and ion energies in the range 10 – 20 keV. Here we present results from a deep level transient spectroscopy studies of ion–implanted MOS capacitors in which interface–trap densities have been measured in as–grown and H–passivated thermal oxides and in ion implanted and rapid–thermally processed devices. For thin oxides of 5nm or less and low ion fluences we find that implantation does not significantly increase interface trap densities and somewhat surprisingly that it can even be beneficial when the interface trap density is abnormally high, (∼ 1 × 1011cm−2.eV−1) in the as-grown oxide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McCamey, D. R. Huebel, H. Brandt, M. S. Hutchison, W. D. McCallum, J. C. Clark, R. G. and Hamilton, A. R. App. Phys. Lett. 89 (18): 21151 (2006).Google Scholar
2. Angus, S. J. Ferguson, A. J. Dzurak, A. S. and Clark, R. G. Nano Letters 7, 2051 (2007).Google Scholar
3. Andresen, S. E. Brenner, R. Wellard, C. J. Yang, C. Hopf, T. Escott, C. Clark, R.G. Dzurak, A. S. and Jamieson, D. N. and Hollenberg, L. C. L, Nano Letters 7, 2000 (2007).Google Scholar
4. Kane, B.E. Nature, 393, 133 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Peterstrom, S.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 63, 672 (1993).Google Scholar
6. DeKeersmaecker, R.F. and DiMaria, D.J.. J. Appl. Phys., 51, 1085 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Ponomarev, Y. V. Stolk, P. A. Dachs, C. J. J. and Woerlee, P. H. Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Solid State Device Research, 128 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Johnson, N. M. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 21 303 (1982).Google Scholar