Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:03:59.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of the humidity effects on SnO2-based sensors in CO detection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Cesare Malagu'
Affiliation:
[email protected], university of ferrara, physics, via saragat 1c, ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy, +390532974294, +390532974325
Michele Benetti
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Ferrara, Physics, via Saragat 1/c, Ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy
Maria Cristina Carotta
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Ferrara, Physics, via Saragat 1/c, Ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy
Alessio Giberti
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Ferrara, Physics, via Saragat 1/c, Ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy
Vincenzo Guidi
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Ferrara, Physics, via Saragat 1/c, Ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy
Luciano Milano
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Ferrara, Physics, via Saragat 1/c, Ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy
Giuliano Martinelli
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Ferrara, Physics, via Saragat 1/c, Ferrara, N/A, 44100, Italy
Get access

Abstract

An algorithm for compensating water vapor pressure in CO detection is proposed here and tested on SnO2 thick-film gas sensors. For each sensor working at a fixed temperature, the conductance, G, is fitted by an analytical surface, whose expression can be inverted to determine the CO concentration once the water partial pressure is measured. As soon as the rate of water-vapor pressure change is slower than about 300 Pa/min, G is a function of the temperature, water vapor and CO concentration. If quicker water vapor variations occur instead, the sensing film undergoes a non-negligible transitory phenomenon during which G assumes different values even at fixed water vapor pressure and temperature. This phenomenon prevents the compensation from working properly. An explanation of the behavior is offered by the interpretation of kinetics equations at surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Syuichi, A., Sakai, G., Shimanoe, K., Yamazoe, N., Oto, K., Chemical Sensors 20 (Suppl. A), 58, (2004).Google Scholar
2 Romppainen, P., Lantto, V., Leppavuori, S., S & AB1, 73, (1990).Google Scholar
3 Sun, Y., Huang, X., Meng, F. and Liu, J., Sensors 4, 95, (2004).Google Scholar
4 Barsan, N. and Weimar, U., Journal of Electroceramics 7, 143, (2001).Google Scholar
5 Giberti, A., Carotta, M. C., Guidi, V., Malagù, C., Martinelli, G., Piga, M., Vendemiati, B., S & AB 103/1-2, 272 (2004).Google Scholar
6 Traversa, E., Vona, M. L. Di, Licoccia, S., Sacerdoti, M., Carotta, M. C., Crema, L. and Martinelli, G., J. Sol­Gel Sci. Technol. 22, 167, (2001).Google Scholar
7 Martinelli, G. and Carotta, M. C., S & A B 23, 157, (1995).Google Scholar
8 Morrison, S. R., in The Chemical Physics of Surfaces (Plenum Press, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
9 Malagù, C., Guidi, V., Stefancich, M., Carotta, M. C. and Martinelli, G., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 808, (2002).Google Scholar
10 Malagù, C., Guidi, V., Carotta, M. C., and Martinelli, Giuliano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4158, (2004).Google Scholar