Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:57:54.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial reactions in multilayers intended for microelectronics devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. Federspiel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de thermoynarnique et physicochimie métallurgique, St Martin d'Hères, France
F. Voiron
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de thermoynarnique et physicochimie métallurgique, St Martin d'Hères, France
M. Ignat
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de thermoynarnique et physicochimie métallurgique, St Martin d'Hères, France
T. Marieb
Affiliation:
Intel Component Research, Santa Clara, CA
H. Fujimoto
Affiliation:
Intel Component Research, Santa Clara, CA
Get access

Abstract

The knowledge of the reaction kinetics which can occur at an interface of a couple of materials, remains a crucial issue to establish the structural limits of a diffusion barrier intended for microelectronic structures.

In the past years, the interfacial reactions activated at an interface of a couple of materials, as for example aluminum and titanium, have been analyzed extensively using different experimental tools, as for example: Ruthreford Back Scattering (thickness determination) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). Then, these experimental methods were useful to deduce parameters, characterizing the interfacial reactions in bulk samples: apparent activation energies, enthalpy of formation. Because in thin films, the kinetics of the reactions that can be activated at an interface will be different; we studied interfacial reactions in submicronic Al/Ti layers.

Taking advantage of the accuracy of the DSC (reaction rate determinations and detection of earlier stages of intermetallic phase formation), our experimental approach consisted in a series of isothermal and non-isothermal DSC experiments on submicron Al/Ti layered structures. From the reaction rate determination, analytical methods as the Kissinger Ozawa approach were used, to determine the apparent activation energies of the phase formation. Also the results allowed to model and discuss the first steps of the interfacial reaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tardy, J., Tu, K.N., Physical Review B, 32, 4, p.20702080 (1984).Google Scholar
2 Vittmer, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 2(2), p. 273–2 79 (1984).Google Scholar
3 Coffey, K.R., Barmak, K., Rudman, D.A., S.Foner, J. Appl.Phys., 72, p. 13411349 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Kissinger, H.E., Anal. Chem., 29, 11, (1957).10.1021/ac60131a045Google Scholar
5 Avrami, M., J. Chem. Phys, 9, p. 177184 (1941).Google Scholar
6 Cahn, J. W., Acta metallurgica, 4, p.449459, (1956).Google Scholar
7 Aaron, H.B., Aaronson, H.I., Acta metallurgica, 16, p. 789798 (1968).10.1016/0001-6160(68)90097-7Google Scholar
8 Colgan, E.G., Matter Sci. Reports, 5, 1 (1990).10.1016/S0920-2307(05)80005-2Google Scholar
9 Ball, R.K., Todd, A.G., Thin solid films, 149, p. 269282 (1987).10.1016/0040-6090(87)90390-7Google Scholar
10 Voiron, F., Ignat, M., Nucleation and Growth of TiA13 from Al/Ti multilayers, internal report 03/02/97.Google Scholar