Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:23:46.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions between Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNT) and Ciliates: SWNT Interfere with Ciliate Ecological Functions and Ciliates Transport/Transform SWNT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Tiffany S. Y. Chan
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Waterloo, chemistry, waterloo, Canada
Fatima Nasser
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Waterloo, chemistry, waterloo, Canada
Christine H. St-Denis
Affiliation:
[email protected], university of Waterloo, biology, waterloo, Canada
Niels C. Bols
Affiliation:
[email protected], university of Waterloo, biology, waterloo, Canada
Shirley Tang
Affiliation:
[email protected], university of Waterloo, chemistry, waterloo, Canada
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the interactions of water soluble single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) with unicellular organisms, in particular a ciliated protozoan (Tetrahymena thermophila) and a bacteria (Escherichia coli), which are common constituents of natural fresh water. The ciliates could effectively incorporate SWNT into natural organic matter (NOM), and therefore into normal ecological processes. Further, SWNT induced the ciliates to egest viable bacteria in membrane-enclosed vesicles. The egested bacteria aggregates had escaped digestion by the protozoan and were able to proliferate and resist antibiotic/disinfectant treatments, which may have important implications to public health. This work highlights the importance of studies on nanoparticle ecotoxicology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Helland, A., Wick, P., Koehler, A., Schmid, K. and Som, C., Envirom. Health Persp. 115, 1125 (2007).Google Scholar
2. Noxall, A.B., Tiede, K. and Chaudhry, Q., Nanomedicine 2, 919 (2007).Google Scholar
3. Smith, C.J., Shaw, B.J. and Handy, R.D., Aquat. Toxicol. 82, 94 (2007).Google Scholar
4. Stern, S.T. and McNeil, S.E., Toxicol. Sci. 101, 4 (2008).Google Scholar
5. Ghafari, P., St-Denis, C.H., Power, M.E., Jin, X., Tsou, V., Mandal, H.S., Bols, N.C. and Tang, X.S., Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 347 (2008).Google Scholar
6. Kam, N.W.S., O'Connell, M., Wisdom, J.A. and Dai, H., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11600 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Power, M.E., Pinheiro, M.D.O., Dayeh, V.R., Butler, B.J., Slawson, R., Lee, L.E.J., Lynn, D.H., Bols, N.C., Water Qual. Res. J. Canada. 41, 301 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Stocks, S.M., Cytom. Part A 61A, 189 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Frankel, J., in Methods in Cell Biology, edited by Asai, J.D. and Forney, J.D. (Academic Press, New York, 1999), p. 28125.Google Scholar
10. Sherr, E.B. and Sherr, B.F., Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 81, 293 (2002).Google Scholar
11. Figueirdo, G.M. De, Nash, R.D.M. and Montagnes, D.J.S., Mar. Biol. 148, 395 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Posch, T. and H, , Arndt, , Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 10, 45 (1996).Google Scholar