Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T10:43:35.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Hydrogen Peroxide With Carbon Steel and Magnetite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Javier Gimenez ,
Ignasi Casas ,
Rosa Sureda  and
Joan de Pablo
Javier Gimenez
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Ignasi Casas
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Rosa Sureda
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Joan de Pablo
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Environmental Technology Area, CTM-Centre Tecnologic, Av. Bases de Manresa 1, 08240 Manresa, Spain
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide is considered as one of the main oxidants formed due to the radiolysis of water. In a spent nuclear fuel repository, it is necessary to establish the interaction of hydrogen peroxide with the elements constituting the repository. The objective of this work is to study the consumption of hydrogen peroxide via reaction with the elements of the canister.

In this sense, two different series of experiments were conducted, with iron steel an magnetite, respectively. Each series consisted on three different experiments that contained a coupon of the solid and different hydrogen peroxide concentrations (10−4 mol·dm−3, 10−5 mol·dm−3 and 10−6 mol·dm−3). Hydrogen concentration in solution was measured at different intervals of time by means of chemiluminescence. At the end of the experiments, the coupons were studied by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in order to determine the possible secondary solid phases formed on the coupons.

In both series of experiments, a decrease of the hydrogen peroxide concentration in solution with time was observed. The determined consumption rates increased with hydrogen peroxide concentration and were higher in steel than in magnetite. The reaction orders relative to hydrogen peroxide concentration were very close to the unity on both solids.

The study of the carbon steel coupons by SEM at the end of the experiments showed that they were more attacked at higher hydrogen peroxide concentrations. On the other hand, the XRD measurements in the steel coupons showed that lepidocrocite (γ-FeO(OH)), and magnetite (Fe3O4) were formed on the coupon as iron secondary solid phases.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1193: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXIII , 2009 , 429
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shoesmith, D.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 282, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Merino, J., Cera, E., Bruno, J., Quinones, J., Casas, I., Clarens, F., Gimenez, J., Pablo, J. de, Rovira, M., Martinez-Esparza, A., J. Nucl. Mater. 346, 40 (2005).Google Scholar
3 Bruno, J., Ewing, R.C., Elements 2, 343 (2006).Google Scholar
4 Eriksen, T.E., Eklund, U.-B., Werme, L.O., Bruno, J., J. Nucl. Mater. 227, 76 (1995).Google Scholar
5 Grambow, B., Loida, A., Dressler, P., Geckeis, H., Gago, J., Casas, I., Pablo, J. de, Gimenez, J., Torrero, M.E., “Chemical reaction of fabricated and high burnup spent UO2 fuel with saline brines”. European Commission, Final Report EUR-17111 (1997).Google Scholar
6 Hugues-Kubatko, K.-A., Helean, K.B., Navrotsky, A., Burns, P.C., Science 302, 1191 (2003).Google Scholar
7 Ekeroth, E., Roth, O., Jonsson, M., J. Nucl. Mater. 355, 38 (2006).Google Scholar
8 Rovira, M., Aamrani, S. El, Duro, L., Gimenez, J., Pablo, J. De, Bruno, J., J. Hazard. Mater. 147, 726 (2007).Google Scholar
9 Seco, F., Hennig, Ch., Pablo, J. de, Rovira, M., Rojo, I., Marti, V., Gimenez, J., Duro, L., Grive, M., Bruno, J., Environ. Sci Technol. 43, 2825 (2009).Google Scholar
10 Blackwood, D.J., Naish, C.C., Platts, N., Taylor, K.J., Thomas, M.I., “The anaerobic corrosion of carbon steel in granitic groundwaters”. SKB Technical Report 95-03, Stockholm (Sweden), 1995.Google Scholar
11 Dodge, C.J., Francis, A.J., Gillow, J.B., Halada, G.P., Eng, C., Clayton, C.R., Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3504 (2002).Google Scholar
12 Price, D., Worsfold, P.J., Montoura, F.C., Anal. Chim. Acta 298, 121 (1994).Google Scholar