Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:11:04.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ TEM Phase Formation in Cold Rolled Aluminum-Nickel Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. Sieber
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 1509 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA, [email protected]
J. H. Perepezko
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 1509 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Multilayer samples of Nickel and Aluminum with an overall composition of Al-20Ni were prepared by cold rolling of elemental foils. The sample microstructures and phases were characterized by XRD, SEM and TEM/SAED, and the reactive phase formation was then examined by DSC measurements. XRD, SEM and TEM measurements show that the rolling procedure results in a decrease of the Al and Ni layer thicknesses (down to 100 nm in average) and a decrease of the grain size (down to less than 50 nm). No phase formation is observed during the cold rolling procedure. In isochronal DSC scans of the Al-Ni multilayers, the formation of the Al3Ni phase was found to be a two step reaction process due to 2-dimensional nucleation and lateral growth and a 3-dimensional phase thickening. While XRD measurements showed Al3Ni as the only phase that forms, more detailed TEM investigations of the samples after DSC treatment also showed a small amount of an amorphous Al-Ni phase, formed by a thermally activated solid state amorphization reaction (SSAR). In-situ TEM heating of the amorphous areas under the electron beam in the microscope yielded the crystallization of the amorphous phase to a B2 structure and a growth of the B2 grains up to 100 nm in size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Colgan, E.G., Mat. Sci. Rep. 5, 44 (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Barmak, K., Michaelson, C., and Lucadamo, G., J. Mater. Res. 12, 133 (1997).Google Scholar
[3] Edelstein, A.S., Everett, R.K., Richardson, G.R., Qadri, S.B., Foley, J.C., and Perepezko, J.H., Mat. Sci. Eng. A195, 13 (1995).Google Scholar
[4] Michaelson, C., Lucadamo, G., and Barmak, K., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 6689 (1996).Google Scholar
[5] Cardellini, F., Mazzone, G. and Antisari, A.V., Acta mater. 44, 1511 (1996).Google Scholar
[6] Atzmon, M., Phys. Rev. Letter 64, 487 (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Schaeublin, R. and Gotthardt, R., Phil. Mag. A, 74, 593 (1996).Google Scholar
[8] Azaroff, L.V., Elements of X-ray Crystallography, McGray-Hill, Inc. (1968).Google Scholar
[9] Bassani, M.H. da Silva, Perepezko, J. H., Edelstein, A.S., and Everett, R.K., Scripta Mat. 37, 227 (1997).Google Scholar
[10] Ma, E., Thompson, C.V., and Clevenger, L.A., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2211 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Cardellini, F., Mazzone, G., Montone, A., and Antisari, A.V., Acta mater. 42, 2445 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Barmak, K., Michaelson, C., Bormann, R., and Lucadamo, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 382 33 (1995).Google Scholar
[13] Sieber, H. and Perepezko, J., in preparation.Google Scholar
[14] Battezzati, L., Antonione, C., and Fracchia, F., Intermetallics 3, 67 (1995).Google Scholar