Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:24:04.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Induction of Hepatocyte Differentiation by the Extracellular Matrix and an RGD-Containing Synthetic Peptide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

David J. Mooney ,
Robert Langer ,
Linda K. Hansen ,
Joseph P. Vacanti  and
Donald E. Ingber
David J. Mooney
Affiliation:
Dept. Chemical Engineering, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139
Robert Langer
Affiliation:
Dept. Chemical Engineering, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139
Linda K. Hansen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Surgery, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115
Joseph P. Vacanti
Affiliation:
Dept. of Surgery, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115
Donald E. Ingber
Affiliation:
Dept. of Surgery, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115
Get access

Abstract

To design novel biomaterials for hepatocyte transplantation it will be necessary to determine whether specific extracellular matrix (ECM) molecule(s) or the adhesive interactions between the surface and hepatocytes are responsible for regulation of hepatocyte function. Purified ECM molecules (laminin, fibronectin, types I and IV collagen) and a synthetic peptide containing the arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) cell-binding sequence were precoated at defined densities to non-adhesive polystyrene dishes. Hepatocytes cultured on dishes coated with a low density of ECM molecules (1 ng/cm2) maintained a round morphology, and high liver-specific protein secretion rates. In contrast, culturing hepatocytes on increasing ECM densities (50–1000 ng/cm2) resulted in extensive cell spreading, a loss of liver-specific protein secretion, and cell growth. Hepatocytes cultured on dishes coated with the RGD-containing peptide did not spread even on a high density of the peptide (10,000 ng/cm2), and albumin secretion remained high for hepatocytes cultured on all peptide densities (1–10,000 ng/cm2). These results suggest that a variety of ECM molecules and synthetic peptides are capable of inducing hepatocyte differentiation in vitro, and these effects depend on their ability to promote cell spreading.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 252: Symposium T – Tissue-Inducing Biomaterials , 1991 , 199
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vacanti, J. P., Morse, M., Saltzman, W., Domb, A., Perez-Atayde, A.; and Langer, R., J. Ped. Sur. 23:3–9 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Cima, L. G., Vacanti, J. P., Vacanti, C., Ingber, D. E., Mooney, D. J., and Langer, R., J. Biomech. Eng. 113:143–151 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Reid, L. M., (Review) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2:121–130 (1990)Google Scholar
4. Bissell, D. M., Arenson, D. M., Maher, J. J., Roll, F. J., Am. Soc. Clin. Inv. 79:801–812 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Caron, J. M., Mol. Cell Biol. 10:1239–1243 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Hynes, R. O., (Review) Cell 48:549–554 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Ben-Ze'ev, A., Robinson, S., Bucher, N. L., Farmer, S. R., Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. USA 85:1–6 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Ingber, D. E., Folkman, J., J. Cell Biol. 109:3579–3583 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Aiken, J., Cima, L., Schloo, B., Mooney, D., Johnson, L., Langer, R., and Vacanti, J. P., J. Ped. Sur. 25:140–145 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Meredith, M. J., Cell Biol. Tox. 4:405–425 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Form, D. M., Pratt, B. M., & Madri, J. A., Lab. Invest. 55:521–530 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Ingber, D. E., Proc. Natil. Acad. Sci. USA 87:3579–3583 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Werb, Z., Tremble, P. M., Behrendtsen, O., Crowley, E., and Damsky, C. H., J. Cell Biol. 109:877–889 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Klagsbum, M., and Baird, A. (Review), Cell 67:229–231 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Ingber, D. E., and Folman, J. in Cell Shape: Determinants, Regulation, and Regulatory Role, edited by Stein, W. D., and Bronner, F., Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., p. 1–32 (1988).Google Scholar