Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:39:07.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Materials Selection in a Mechanical Engineering Capstone Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Bridget M. Smyser*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

The Capstone Design course in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University requires students to build a physical prototype by the end of the two semester sequence. Although students have long been required to take an introductory materials science course as part of their curriculum, there was concern that materials selection was a weakness in the design process. Beginning in Fall 2011, the CES Edupack materials selection software was introduced into the Capstone Design class. The current work means to investigate: 1) how to assess designs for effective materials selection 2) whether the new software was actually used by the student teams and 3) whether there was evidence of improved materials selection in the projects that occurred after the new software was introduced. Final capstone design reports from 10 previous terms were examined to look for evidence of systematic materials selection procedures and clear discussion of materials properties as the basis for selecting a material. References to the software were also noted. Results show that 24% of the groups used the CES Edupack software in the first three terms that the software was available. In addition, there was an increase in the number of groups that used a systematic selection process based on research into published materials properties rather than choosing materials based on rough experimentation or convenience. Finally, there has been an increase in the number of projects which consider or incorporate composites, high temperature alloys, and advanced polymers as the software has increased awareness of these options.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dutson, A. J., Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P., and Sorensen, C.D., J. Eng. Education, 86, (1), pp. 1728 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J., in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, IL, (2006).Google Scholar
CES Edupack, Granta Design Limited. (2013)Google Scholar
Griffin, R., Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT, (2004)Google Scholar
Demetry, C., “Research on Use of Cambridge Engineering Selector (CES4) Software in an Introductory Materials Science Course”, Portland, OR, (2005)Google Scholar
Pai, D.M., Kailasshankar, B., Adams, C. and Filatovs, G.J., Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Nashville, TN, (2003)Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M.N., Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, OR, (2005)Google Scholar
Crosby, K. and Blevins, E., Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, IL, (2006).Google Scholar
Vollaro, M., Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI, (2007)Google Scholar
Ashby, M.F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford, 2 nd edition, (1999)Google Scholar