Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:39:43.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement in Contact Resistivity to thin film Bi2Te3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Rahul P Gupta
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States
Ka Xiong
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Texas at Dallas, Material Science and Engineering, Richardson, Texas, United States
John B White
Affiliation:
[email protected], Marlow Industries Incorporated, a subsidiary of II-VI Incorporated, Dallas, Texas, United States
Kyeongjae Cho
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Texas at Dallas, Material Science and Engineering, Richardson, Texas, United States
Bruce Gnade
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Texas at Dallas, Material Science and Engineering, Richardson, Texas, United States
Get access

Abstract

A study of the impact of surface preparation and post-deposition annealing on contact resistivity for sputtered Ni and Co contacts to thin film Bi2Te3 is presented. The contact resistance values obtained using the transfer length method (TLM) for Ni is compared to Co as a potential contact metal to Bi2Te3. Post-deposition annealing at 100°C on samples that were sputter cleaned reduces the contact resistivity to < 10-7 Ω-cm2 for both Ni and Co contacts to Bi2Te3. Co provided similar contact resistance values as Ni, but had better adhesion and less diffusion into the thermoelectric (TE) material, making it a suitable candidate for contact metallization to Bi2Te3 based devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rushing, L. Shakouri, A. Abraham, P. and Bowers, J.E. Proc. 16th International nternational Conference on Thermoelectrics, pp. 646, Dresden, Germany, (1997).Google Scholar
2 Xiong, Ka, Wang, W. Alshareef, H. N., Gupta, R.P. White, J. B., Gnade, B. E. and Cho, Kyeongjae, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1166, pp. 1166–N05 N05 (2009).Google Scholar
3 Anatychuk, L. I. and Luste, O. J., Proc. 15th International nternational Conference on Thermoelectrics, pp. 279 Pasadena, CA (1996).Google Scholar
4 Rowe, D.M. Thermoelectrics Handbook, pp. 1 17, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2006).Google Scholar
5 Robinson, G.Y. Thin Solid Films, 72, 129 (1980).Google Scholar
6 Shockley, W. Goetzberger, A. and Scarlett, R.M. Rep. No. AFAL AFAL-TDR TDR-64 64-207 AFA Lab., Wright-Patterson Air Force, OH (1964).Google Scholar
7 Schroder, D.K. Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, p pp. 132, 138 3rd ed., Wiley Wiley-Interscience (2006).Google Scholar
8 Floyd, L.P. Scheuermann, T. Herbert, P.A.F. and Kelly, W.M. Solid Solid-state Electronics, 37 (9), 1579 (1994).Google Scholar
9 Lundberg, N. and Ostling, M. Solid Solid-State Electronics, V38 (N12), 2023 (1995).Google Scholar
10 Ueng, H.J. and Janes, D.B. IEEE Tran Transactions on Electron Devices, 48(4), 758 (2001).Google Scholar
11 Gupta, R.P. Iyore, O.D. Xiong, K. White, J.B. Cho, K. Alshareef, H.N. and Gnade, B.E. Electrochemical and Solid Solid- state Letters, 12 (10), H395 (2009).Google Scholar
12 Iyore, O.D. Lee, T.H. Gupta, R.P. White, J.B. Alshareef, H.N., Kim, M.J. and Gnade, B.E., Surface and Interface Analysis, 41(5), 440 (2009).Google Scholar
(13. Xiong, K. Wang, W. Alshareef, H.N. Gupta, R.P. White, J.B. Gnade, B.E. and Cho, K. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 43, 115303 (2010).Google Scholar
14 Ueng, H.J. and Janes, D.B. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices Devices, 48 (4), 758 (2001).Google Scholar