Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:44:29.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved Resistive Switching Properties in HfO2-based ReRAMs by Hf/Au Doping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2012

Xiaoli He
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12203
Natalya A. Tokranova
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12203
Wei Wang
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12203
Robert E. Geer
Affiliation:
College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12203
Get access

Abstract

Emerging NVM devices have been extensively studied as candidates to extend density scaling and power reduction beyond Si-based flash. Recently, resistive-random-access-memory (ReRAM) devices in the form of metal-insulator-metal (MIM) structures have attracted substantial attention due to their potential scalability, low power operation, and high speed. HfO2 is attractive compared to other transition metal oxides from the vantage point of CMOS process compatibility. Here, we investigate doped HfO2 with a Pt top electrode on an n+-Si substrate. By doping HfO2 with Hf or Au, improved resistive switching properties have been demonstrated in terms of enhanced cycling endurance and lower switching voltages for SET and RESET. The improvements were attributed to doping-induced oxygen vacancies. In addition, Cu-doped HfO2 devices have exhibited multilevel resistive switching.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shiga, H. et al. , IEEE J. Solid-state Circuits 45, 142 (2010).Google Scholar
2. Huai, Y., AAPPS Bulletin 18, 33(2008).Google Scholar
3. Burr, G. W. et al. , J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 28, 223 (2010).Google Scholar
4. Waser, R., Dittmann, R., Staikov, G. and Szot, K., Adv. Mater. 21, 2632 (2009).Google Scholar
5. Liu, M., Abid, Z., Wang, W., He, X., Liu, Q. and Guan, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 233106 (2009).Google Scholar
6. Butcher, B., He, X., Huang, M., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Lv, H., Liu, M. and Wang, W., Nanotechnol. 21, 475206 (2010).Google Scholar
7. Wang, Y. et al. , Nanotechnol. 21, 045202 (2010).Google Scholar
8. Yang, J. J., Pickett, M. D., Li, X., Ohlberg, D. A. A., Stewart, D. R. and Williams, R. S., Nature Nanotechnol. 3, 429 (2008).Google Scholar
9. Liu, Q., Guan, W., Long, S., Liu, M., Zhang, S., Wang, Q. and Chen, J., J. Appl. Phys. 104, 114524 (2008).Google Scholar
10. Chan, M. Y., Zhang, T., Ho, V. and Lee, P. S., Microelectronic Engineering 85, 2420 (2008).Google Scholar
11. Goux, L., Wang, X. P., Pantisano, L., Jossart, N., Govoreanu, B., Kittl, J. A., Jurczak, M., Altimine, L. and Wouters, D. J., Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 14, H244 (2011).Google Scholar
12. Liu, Q., Dou, C., Wang, Y., Long, S., Wang, W., Liu, M., Zhang, M. and Chen, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 023501 (2009)Google Scholar
13. Russo, U., Kamalanathan, D., Ielmini, D., Lacaita, A. L., and Kozicki, M. N., IEEE Trans. Electron Device, 56, 1040 (2009).Google Scholar
14. Manem, H., Rose, G. S., He, X. and Wang, W., in Proc. of the 20th ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2010 (Providence, RI, May 2010), pp. 287192.Google Scholar