Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:20:33.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved CdZnTe detectors grown by vertical Bridgman Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

K. G. Lynn
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-2814
M. Weber
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-2814
H. L. Glass
Affiliation:
Johnson Matthey Electronics, Spokane, WA 99216
J. P. Flint
Affiliation:
Johnson Matthey Electronics, Spokane, WA 99216
Cs. Szeles
Affiliation:
eV Products division of II-VI, Inc., Saxonburg, PA 16056
Get access

Abstract

The γ ray (57Co) and α particle (241Am) detector response of Cdl-xZnxTe crystals grown by vertical Bridgman technique was studied under both positive and negative bias conditions. Postgrowth processing was utilized to produce a high-resistivity material with improved chargecollection properties. Samples of various Zn concentrations were investigated by I-V measurements and thermally stimulated spectroscopies to determine the ionization energies of deep levels in the band gap. When the post-processing conditions were optimized the lowenergy tailing of the γ-ray photopeaks was significantly reduced and an energy resolution of under 5% was achieved for the 122 keV γ-photon line in crystals with x=0.2 Zn content at room temperature. A peak to background ratio of 14:1 for the 122 keV photopeak from 57Co was observed on the best sample, using a standard planar detection geometry. The low-energy 14.4 keV X-ray line could also be observed and distinguished from the noise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] CdTe and Related Cd Rich Alloys, edited by Triboulet, R., Wilcox, W.R., and Oda, O. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993).Google Scholar
[2] Semiconductors for Room Temperature Nuclear Detector Applications, edited by Schlesinger, T.E. and James, R.B. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1995).Google Scholar
[3] Raiskin, E. and Butler, J.F., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–35, 8184 (1988).Google Scholar
[4] Doty, F.P., Butler, J.F., Schetzina, J.F., and Bowers, K.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B10, 1418–1422 (1992).Google Scholar
[5] Luke, P.N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 28842886 (1994).Google Scholar
[6] Eisen, Y. and Horowitz, Y., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A353, 60–66 (1994).Google Scholar
[7] Santic, B. and Desnica, U.V., Appl. Phys. Lett., 56, 26362638 (1990).Google Scholar
[8] Huang, Z.C., Xie, K., and Wie, C.R., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 19511954 (1991).Google Scholar
[9] Bube, R.H., Photoconductivity of Solids, (Wiley, New York, 1960), p. 292.Google Scholar
[10] Glass, H.L., Socha, A.J., Bakken, D.W., Speziale, V.M., and Flint, J.P., Fall 1997 MRS meeting, elsewhere in these proceedings (1997) to be published.Google Scholar
[11] Rudolph, P., Rinas, U., and Jacobs, K., J. Crystal Growth, 138, 249254 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Rudolph, P., Kawasaki, S., Yamashita, S., Yamamoto, S., Usuki, Y., Konagaya, Y., Matada, S., and Fukuda, T., J. Crystal Growth, 161, 2833 (1996).Google Scholar
[13] Lavietes, A.D., McQuaid, J.H., Ruhter, W.D., Paulus, T.J., LLNL Preprint (1994).Google Scholar
[14] Knoll, G.F., and McGregor, D.S., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 302, 17 (1993).Google Scholar
[15] Szeles, Cs., Shan, Y.Y., Lynn, K.G., and Moodenbaugh, A.R., Phys. Rev. B 55, 69456949 (1997).Google Scholar