Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:42:58.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immobilization and Long-term Evolution of Selenate in Portland Cement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Isabel Rojo
Affiliation:
[email protected], CTM, Manresa, Spain
Mireia Grive
Affiliation:
[email protected], AMPHOS 21, Barcelona, Spain
Miquel Rovira
Affiliation:
[email protected], CTM, Manresa, Spain
Olga Riba
Affiliation:
[email protected], AMPHOS 21, Barcelona, Spain
David Garcia
Affiliation:
[email protected], AMPHOS 21, Barcelona, Spain
Cristina Domènech
Affiliation:
[email protected], AMPHOS 21, Barcelona, Spain
Joan De Pablo
Affiliation:
[email protected], UPC, Chemical Engineering, Barcelona, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The long-term selenate uptake capacity of leached cement was studied by means of a replenishment batch experiment with cement pore water (CPW) doped with selenate. The corresponding blank experiment (without Se) was also done. The systems were studied for 31 cycles (18-days each cycle) to understand the long-term selenate immobilization in leached cement. Results showed that the retention capacity of leached cement exponentially decreases with cycle evolution. Precipitation of ettringite, identified by SEM and XRD, occurred along the experiments. The characterization of the cement solid phases indicated that selenate was only retained in the precipitated ettringite.

Experimental data have been successfully modeled by assuming that selenate incorporates into the precipitating ettringite. Precipitation of ettringite is controlled by the kinetic dissolution of the initially present monocarboaluminate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1a)Konsult, K., Technical report NTB 88–42, Nagra, Switzerland (1989). b) F. Chen, P.C. Burns and R.C. Ewing, J. Nucl. Mater. 275, 81 (1999). c) ENRESA, Report 48- 1P-MOOG- 21, Madrid, Spain, 1997.Google Scholar
2 Ochs, M., Lotenbach, B. and Giffaut, E., Radiochim. Acta 90, 639646 (2002).Google Scholar
3 Baur, I. and Johnson, C.A., Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 34423447 (2003).Google Scholar
4a) Bonhoure, I. and Baur, I., Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 9198 (2006). b) N.D.M. Evans, Cem. Concr. Res. 38, 543-553 (2008). c) P. Kumarathasan, G.J. McCarthy, D.J. Hassett and D.F. Pflughoeft-Hassett, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 178, 83-104 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Rojo, I., Rovira, M., Martí, V., Pablo, J. de, Duro, L., Gaona, X., Colàs, E. and Grivé, M. in Mobile Fission and Activation Products in Nuclear Waste Disposal Workshop Proceedings, NEA 06310, La Baule, France, 4353.Google Scholar
6(a) Irassar, E.F., Cem. Concr. Res. 39, 241254 (2009). (b) H.F.W. Taylor, (1997) Cement chemistry, 2ond ed., Thomas Telford Publishing, London.Google Scholar
7 Matschei, T., Lothenbach, B. and Glasser, F.P.. Cem. Concr. Res. 37, 118130 (2007).Google Scholar
8 Parkhurst, D.L and Appelo, C.A.J., USGS Report 994259 (1999)Google Scholar
9a) Warren, C.J. and Reardon, E.J.. Cem. Concr. Res., 24, 1511524 (1994). b) Olin, B. Noläng, E.G. Osadchii, L.O. öhman and E. Rosén. NEA-TDB, v.7, (2005). c) R.B. Perkins and C.D. Palmer. Geochim. Cosmochim, Acta, 63, 1969–1980 (1999). d) D.D. Wagman, W.H. Evans, V.B. Parker, R.H. Schumm, I. Halow, S.M. Bailey, K.L. Churney and R.L. Nutall. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 11, 2.Google Scholar
10 Ayora, C., Soler, J., Saaltink, M. and Carrera, J.. Enresa Publicación técnica PT0507 (2007).Google Scholar
11 Windt, L. De, Pellegrini, D., J. van der Lee. J.of Cont. Hyd. 68, 165182 (2004).Google Scholar