Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:36:14.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High Conductivity FIB Deposited Metal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

P.G. Blauner  and
A. Wagner
P.G. Blauner
Affiliation:
IBM Watson Research Center, PO Box 218, Yorktown HeightsNY 10598 USA, [email protected]
A. Wagner
Affiliation:
IBM Watson Research Center, PO Box 218, Yorktown HeightsNY 10598 USA, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The ion beam induced metal deposition processes now employed by commercial focused ion beam (FIB) tools all demonstrate less than optimal characteristics for use in circuit repair, a major application of these tools. In particular, the processes have low efficiencies, the metals produced have poor conductivity, and some form of clean up is generally required to remove excess material surrounding the repair site. The gold deposition process developed for x-ray mask repair, in contrast, exhibits efficiencies 10-50 times higher with significantly less material deposited in unwanted areas. Unfortunately, the conductivity of the gold is even poorer than that of materials now used for FIB circuit repair.

In this paper, an annealing step which improves the conductivity of FIB deposited Au is described. Results are presented demonstrating resistivities of 5-15 μΩ-cm while maintaining the high efficiency of the gold deposition process. The suitability of the process for use in FIB circuit repair is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 396: Symposium A – Ion-Solid Interactions for Materials Modification and Processing , 1995 , 695
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Blauner, P.G., Proc. 1991 Intern. MicroProcess Conference, Jap. J. of Appl. Phys. Series 5, p.309 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Dubner, A.D., Wagner, A., Melngailis, J., and Thompson, C.V., J. Appl. Phys. 70, p.665 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Kaito, T., Adachi, T., US Patent 4,876,112 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Stewart, D.K., Stern, L.A., and Morgan, J.C., Proc. SPIE 1089 p. 18 (1989).Google Scholar
5 Puretz, J. and Swanson, L.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B10, p. 2695 (1992).Google Scholar
6 Blauner, P.G., Butt, Y., Ro, J.S., Thompson, C.V., and Melngailis, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B7, p. 1816 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Delia Ratta, A.D., Melngailis, J., and Thompson, C.V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11, p. 2195 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Blauner, P.G., Dubner, A.D., and Wagner, A., IBM Tech. Disci. Bul. 36, p.375 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Blauner, P.G. and Mauer, J., IBM J. of Res. and Devel. 37, p.421 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Wagner, A., Levin, J.P., Mauer, J.L., Blauner, P.G., and Longo, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B8, p. 1557 (1990).Google Scholar
11 Stewart, D.K., Doherty, J.A., Doyle, A.F., and Morgan, J.C., Proc. Photomask Japan, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan (Apr. 1995).Google Scholar
12 Nash, S.C., Faure, T.B., Levin, J.P., Puisto, D.M., Rocque, J.M., Kimmel, K.R., McCord, M.A., and Viswanathan, R.G., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, p. 6878 (1994).Google Scholar
13 Wagner, A., Levin, J.P., and Kirch, S.J., U.S. Patent 5,149,974 (1992).Google Scholar