Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:33:33.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravitational Effects on Mercuric Iodide Crystal Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Bruce Steiner ,
Lodewijk Van Den Berg  and
Uri Laor
Bruce Steiner
Affiliation:
NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, [email protected]
Lodewijk Van Den Berg
Affiliation:
Constellation Technology Corp., Largo, FL 33777; work carried out while the author was at EG& G Energy Measurements, Goleta, CA
Uri Laor
Affiliation:
Nuclear Research Centre, Be'er Sheva, 84910 Israel
Get access

Abstract

Gravity can affect the physical vapor growth of mercuric iodide in two distinct ways. First, gravity will induce convection during growth, which strongly mixes residual impurities and any elementary gases resulting from imperfect stoichiometry, either of which can then form precipitates in the growing crystal. Second, gravity loads the resulting crystal, which is particularly soft while still hot, especially in the absence of precipitates. We have investigated the effects of these processes on the resulting crystalline regularity and the effects of various types of irregularity, in turn, on performance.

High resolution synchrotron x-radiation diffraction imaging of three generations of crystals, grown both in microgravity and in full gravity, provide graphic evidence of the influence of gravity on mercuric iodide crystal growth. These images tie together the results of other characterization studies, identifying the crystallographic sources of the observed property enhancement in microgravity. The first process, convection, is found to be particularly important, both in its influence on observed crystalline regularity and in the resulting electronic performance of detectors made from these crystals.

As a result of these investigations, the crystalline regularity and performance of terrestrial crystals has been substantially improved, although the resulting crystals have not yet achieved parity with the performance of crystals grown in microgravity. We propose new experiments in microgravity for property optimization.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 551: Symposium JJ – Materials in Space-Science, Technology & Exploration , 1998 , 203
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Berg, L. van den and Schnepple, W. F., “Mercuric Iodide Crystal Growth in Space,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 283, 335–338 (1989)Google Scholar
[2] Berg, L. van den, Growth of Single Crystals of Mercuric Iodide on the Ground and in Space,” Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 302, 73–83 (1993)Google Scholar
[3] Gemrsh, V. M., “Characterization and Quantification of Detector Performance,” in Schlesinger, T. E. and James, R. B., ed., Semiconductors for Room Temperature Nuclear Detector Applications, Semiconductors and Semimetals 43, 493–530 (1995)Google Scholar
[4] Berg, L. van den, Schnepple, W., Ortale, C., and Schieber, M., “Vapor Growth of Doped Mercuric Iodide Crystals by the Temperature Oscillation Method,” J. Cryst. Grovth 42, 160–165 (1977)Google Scholar
[5] Lamonds, H. A., “Review ofMercuric Iodide Development Program in Santa Barbara,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. 213, 5–12, (1983)Google Scholar
[6] Kuriyama, M., Steiner, B. W., and Dobbyn, R. C., “Dynamical Diffraction Imaging (Topography) with X-Ray Synchrotron Radiation,” Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci. 19, 183–207 (1989)Google Scholar
[7] Milstein, B, Farber, B., Kim, K., Berg, L. van den, and Schnepple, W. F., “Influence of Temperature upon Dislocation Mobility and Elastic Limit ofsingle Crystal HgI2 ,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. 213, 65–76 (1983)Google Scholar
[8] Burger, A., Morgan, S., He, C., Silberman, E., Berg, L. van den, Ortale, C., Franks, L., and Schieber, M., “A Study oflnhomogeneity and Deviationsfrom Stoichiometry in Mercuric Iodide,” J. Cryst. Growvth 99, 988–993 (1990)Google Scholar
[9] Nicolau, Y. F. and Dupuy, M., “Study of α HgI2 Crystals Grown in Space by Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Scanning Cathodoluminescence Microscopy and Optical Microscopy,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res, A 283, 355–362 (1989)Google Scholar
[10] Remy, F., Gastaldi, J., and LeLay, G., “Observation of Bulk- Growth Defects in α-Hgl2, Single Crystals by Synchrotron X-ray Transmission Topography,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B 83, 229–234 (1993)Google Scholar
[11] Gits, S., Characterization of Extended Defects in α-HgI2 Single Crystals,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. 213, 43–50 (1983)Google Scholar
[12] Schieber, M., Ortale, C., Berg, L. van den, Schnepple, W., Keller, L., Wagner, C.N.J., Yelon, W., Ross, F., Georgeson, G., and Milstein, F., “Correlation between Mercuric Iodide Detector Performance and Crystalline Perfection,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 283, 172–187 (1989)Google Scholar
[13] Chernov, A. A., “How does the flow within the boundary layer influence morphological stability of a vicinalface?,” J. Cryst. Growth 118, 333–347 (1992)Google Scholar
[14] Steiner, Bruce, Berg, Lodewijk van den, and Laor, Uri, “High resolution Diffraction Imaging of Mercuric Iodide: Demonstration of the Necessity for Alternate Crystal Processing Techniques for Highly Purified Material.” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 375, 259–264 (1995)Google Scholar